-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
[KEP-3962]Promote MAP to beta in 1.34 #5251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cici37
commented
Apr 16, 2025
- One-line PR description:
- Issue link: Mutating Admission Policies #3962
- Other comments:
keps/sig-api-machinery/3962-mutating-admission-policies/README.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
||
| - Gather feedback from developers and surveys | ||
| - Complete features A, B, C | ||
| - Add metrics for MAP admission plugin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these metrics the ones you still want to implement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes mostly^^
|
SIG leads chatted about KEPs. The ask for this KEP is that we verify this KEP meets all the new Beta criteria: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-architecture/5241-beta-featuregate-promotion-requirements |
|
/assign @deads2k |
keps/sig-api-machinery/3962-mutating-admission-policies/kep.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I think we have a couple gaps on the criteria for this PR right now. Once those are addressed, I think we can be ready. |
866e952 to
3a4c61b
Compare
|
Thank you for the review. I have rephrased the criteria based on new sig arch guidance. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you should revisit some of the PRR questions again.
As we promote to beta, we should answer these questions more concretely.
There should be a walkthrough of the upgrade testing that will be performanced (and ideally it will be done before promoting to feature gate on).
Do you need more input on metrics or is what you have sufficient?
This question is unanswered.
|
@kannon92 Thanks for the review. I have added more details for the PRR section. Please take a look when you have time :) |
|
TY! LGTM. /assign @deads2k |
|
PRR looks good. sig content looks good. Please update the one criteria bit I highlighted. /approve |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cici37, deads2k The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |