Skip to content

Conversation

@goran-ethernal
Copy link
Contributor

@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal commented Aug 14, 2025

🔄 Changes Summary

This PR adds support for FEP certificates validation in aggsender-validator.

⚠️ Breaking Changes

NA

📋 Config Updates

Added new config parameters to Validator config:

  • Mode - mode of the validator. Similar to regular aggsender (proposer) it can be PessimisticProof or AggchainProof based on if the network is a PP or FEP.

  • FEPConfig - FEP (AggchainProof mode) network specific configuration:

    • SovereignRollupAddr - address of the AggchainFEP contract.
    • RequireNoFEPBlockGap - true if the AggSender should not accept a gap between last block from last certificate and first block of FEP network.
  • 🧾 Diff/Config snippet:

[Validator]
# PessimisticProof or AggchainProof
Mode = "PessimisticProof"
[Validator.FEPConfig]
   SovereignRollupAddr = "{{AggSender.SovereignRollupAddr}}"
   RequireNoFEPBlockGap = "{{AggSender.RequireNoFEPBlockGap}}"

✅ Testing

  • 🤖 Automatic: aggkit CI

🐞 Issues

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just populate the Changes Summary section in the PR desc

@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal merged commit 92db034 into feat/aggsender-multisig Aug 15, 2025
22 checks passed
@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal deleted the feat/support-fep-in-validator branch August 15, 2025 06:04
Stefan-Ethernal added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2025
## 🔄 Changes Summary

Enable the AggSender to work with multiple validator nodes in a
committee-based validation system. The implementation includes validator
services, multisig committee management, certificate validation
improvements, and enhanced gRPC communication protocols.

**Multisig Committee Support:** 
- Added `MultisigCommittee` type to manage signer sets and enforce
signature thresholds.
- Signers are represented as `SignerInfo` structs with both address and
URL for improved context and error reporting.
- Committee construction validates non-empty membership and non-zero
threshold, preventing misconfiguration.
- Dynamic signer management: methods for adding signers, duplicate
checks by address and URL.

**Aggsender Validator Refactor:**
- The Aggsender certificate validation flow was refactored to integrate
multisig logic.
- The multisig validation logic is applicable to both `PP` and `FEP`
certificates.
- Certificate validation now checks for contiguous certificates, last L2
block, and settlement status using new queries.
- Import bridge exit proof verification is handled via new logic using
`verifyClaimProofs`, ensuring only valid proofs pass.

**Certificate Metadata removal:**
- It is gone from the agglayer and therefore it is not sent anymore from
the aggsender either.
- Only thing worth noting is that, when calculating `CertificateID`,
instead of metadata field, which was used previously, we now use
`ZeroHash`.

**Smart contracts integration:**
- **AggchainFEP contract:** Removed querying of `TrustedSequencer`
address and rely on the signers committee instead
- **AggchainBase contract:** Retrieve the multisig committee from the
`AggchainBase` contract

**Agglayer integration:**
- Invoke the `GetNetworkState` API from agglayer to get the latest
settled imported bridge exit info.
- Multisig is populated into the certificate and sent to the Agglayer's
`SendCertificate` gRPC endpoint

## ⚠️ Breaking Changes
- 🛠️ **Config**: Make sure that `Mode` on the `Validator` and
`AggSender` are the same.
- 🔌 **API/CLI**: `aggkit` version (`v0.7.0`) that supports `multisig`
will now require updated contracts to run. At least version
`v12.1.0-rc.3` of `agglayer-contracts`, and a new version of `agglayer`
which supports `multisig`, which is the `v0.4.0` of `agglayer`.
- 🗑️ **Deprecated Features**: Aggsender Phase II validator signing logic

## 📋 Config Updates
- Added `AggSender.RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck = false` parameter,
which defines if a check on `aggsender proposer` startup will be
performed to see if the proposer is in the `multisig` committee.
- Added `Validator.RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck =
{{AggSender.RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck}}` parameter, which defines
if a check on `aggsender validator` startup will be performed to see if
the validator is in the `multisig` committee.
- Added `Validator.Mode = "PessimisticProof"` parameter, which acts the
same as the `AggSender.Mode`. It tells the validator that the network is
a `PP` network or an `FEP` network. It has to be the same as on
`aggsender proposer`.
- Added `Validator.FEPConfig.SovereignRollupAddr =
"{{AggSender.SovereignRollupAddr}}" parameter which is the address of
the `AggchainFEP` rollup on L1 for given network for which validator is
running.
- Added `Validator.FEPConfig.RequireNoBlockGap =
{{AggSender.RequireNoFEPBlockGap}}, which acts the same as the given
paremeter on `AggSender` (proposer) config, and tells the validator if
gaps in blocks in certificates are allowed in `FEP` network.

```toml
[AggSender]
RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck = false

[Validator]
# PessimisticProof or AggchainProof
Mode = "PessimisticProof"
RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck = {{AggSender.RequireCommitteeMembershipCheck}}
[Validator.FEPConfig]
	SovereignRollupAddr = "{{AggSender.SovereignRollupAddr}}"
	RequireNoBlockGap = "{{AggSender.RequireNoFEPBlockGap}}"
```

## ✅ Testing
- 🤖 **Automatic**: `aggkit` CI
- 🖱️ **Manual**: [Optional: Steps to verify]

## 🐞 Issues
- Closes #792 
## 🔗 Related PRs
- #814
- #832
- #838
- #839
- #843
- #842
- #846
- #858
- #847
- #865
- #861
- #863
- #875
- #876
- #881
- #877
- #898
- #920
- #913
- #926
- #945
- #951
- #954
- #957
- #955
- #974
- #978
- #985
- #989
- #984
- #998
- #1017
- #1028
- #1034
- #1024
- #1052
- #1067
- #1068
- #1050
- #1071
- #1072
- #1060
- #1087
- #1077
- #1073

---------

Co-authored-by: Goran Rojovic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Goran Rojovic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joan Esteban <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rachit Sonthalia <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arpit Temani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants