test fix #306
test fix #306
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jbhanu-thoughtspot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a minor adjustment to the pre-authentication cache logic, specifically by commenting out a condition that checks for a full app embed with a visible primary navbar. This change appears to be a targeted fix, likely to address a specific test case or unblock a development scenario related to embedding functionality.
Highlights
- Pre-authentication Cache Logic Adjustment: A condition
this.isFullAppEmbedWithVisiblePrimaryNavbar()has been commented out in theisDisabledcalculation for the pre-authentication cache withinsrc/embed/ts-embed.ts. This change is likely a temporary measure or part of a test fix.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.✅ security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) ✅ license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) |
|
SonarQube Quality Gate
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request comments out a line of code related to the pre-auth cache logic. This is generally not a good practice for production code. If this change is intended to be permanent, the commented-out code and its associated explanatory comments should be removed entirely to maintain code clarity. If this is a temporary change for debugging, it should not be merged. Furthermore, this change appears to break existing unit tests, which is a significant concern.
| this.viewConfig.overrideOrgId !== undefined | ||
| || this.embedConfig.disablePreauthCache === true | ||
| || this.isFullAppEmbedWithVisiblePrimaryNavbar() | ||
| // || this.isFullAppEmbedWithVisiblePrimaryNavbar() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commenting out code is generally discouraged as it can lead to confusion and code rot. If this condition is no longer necessary, it should be removed completely rather than commented out. Also, please consider removing the related comment block on lines 267-269 which now becomes stale. This change also seems to break existing unit tests.
No description provided.