Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Fixes #97163

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 29, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 29, 2022
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2022

📌 Commit 2e25c23 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 30, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 30, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97494 (Use Box::new() instead of box syntax in library tests)
 - rust-lang#97499 (Remove "sys isn't exported yet" phrase)
 - rust-lang#97504 (Ensure source file present when calculating max line number)
 - rust-lang#97519 (Re-add help_on_error for download-ci-llvm)
 - rust-lang#97531 (Note pattern mismatch coming from `for` loop desugaring)
 - rust-lang#97545 (Reword safety comments in core/hash/sip.rs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 65bdfe3 into rust-lang:master May 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 30, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the for-loop-pat-mismatch branch August 11, 2023 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mislead type ascribed to collection in a for loop diagnostic error
6 participants