- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default #94415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) | 
It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml.
734822f    to
    7ad4297      
    Compare
  
    | @bors r+ rollup | 
| 📌 Commit 7ad4297 has been approved by  | 
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Feb 27, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…Simulacrum Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml. cc `@antoyo`
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Feb 27, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…Simulacrum Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml. cc ``@antoyo``
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Feb 28, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…askrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94396 (1 - Make more use of `let_chains`) - rust-lang#94397 (Document that pre-expansion lint passes are softly deprecated) - rust-lang#94399 (Add test for rust-lang#79465 to prevent regression) - rust-lang#94409 (avoid rebuilding bootstrap when PATH changes) - rust-lang#94415 (Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default) - rust-lang#94417 (Fix duplicated impl links) - rust-lang#94420 (3 - Make more use of `let_chains`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    A-gcc
  Things relevant to the [future] GCC backend 
  
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise.
This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen
backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make
much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend
other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of
rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right
backend as first enabled backend in config.toml.
cc @antoyo