test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved #145766
Merged
+74
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is to prove that the frontmatter is preserved. The choices in tests is intended for showing the different parts of the proposed Style Guide for frontmatters.
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Probably worth rolling a rustfmt reviewer |
epage
commented
Aug 25, 2025
calebcartwright
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2025
|
@bors r=calebcartwright rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2025
test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved This is to prove that the frontmatter is preserved. The choices in tests is intended for showing the different parts of the proposed Style Guide for frontmatters (rust-lang#145617). While rustfmt is developed in a different repo, work involving upstream integration is blocked on some work that is being finished up in that repo. I was told that it would be ok to post against this repo in the mean time. Tracking issue: rust-lang#136889
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #143193 (Port `#[link]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure ) - #144373 (remove deprecated Error::description in impls) - #144885 (Implement some more checks in `ptr_guaranteed_cmp`. ) - #145535 (make rustdoc::invalid_html_tags more robust) - #145766 (test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved) - #145811 (Fix some minor issues in comments) - #145814 (Handle unwinding fatal errors in codegen workers) - #145815 (Wait for DPkg frontend lock when trying to remove packages) - #145821 (compiletest: if a compiler fails, show its output) - #145845 (Make `x test distcheck` self-contained) - #145847 (Don't show warnings from xcrun with -Zverbose-internals) - #145856 (Update books) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved This is to prove that the frontmatter is preserved. The choices in tests is intended for showing the different parts of the proposed Style Guide for frontmatters (rust-lang#145617). While rustfmt is developed in a different repo, work involving upstream integration is blocked on some work that is being finished up in that repo. I was told that it would be ok to post against this repo in the mean time. Tracking issue: rust-lang#136889
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #143193 (Port `#[link]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure ) - #143689 (Allow linking a prebuilt optimized compiler-rt builtins library) - #144885 (Implement some more checks in `ptr_guaranteed_cmp`. ) - #145535 (make rustdoc::invalid_html_tags more robust) - #145766 (test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved) - #145811 (Fix some minor issues in comments) - #145814 (Handle unwinding fatal errors in codegen workers) - #145815 (Wait for DPkg frontend lock when trying to remove packages) - #145821 (compiletest: if a compiler fails, show its output) - #145845 (Make `x test distcheck` self-contained) - #145847 (Don't show warnings from xcrun with -Zverbose-internals) - #145856 (Update books) - #145858 (Update wasm-component-ld dependency) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #143689 (Allow linking a prebuilt optimized compiler-rt builtins library) - #144885 (Implement some more checks in `ptr_guaranteed_cmp`. ) - #145535 (make rustdoc::invalid_html_tags more robust) - #145766 (test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved) - #145811 (Fix some minor issues in comments) - #145814 (Handle unwinding fatal errors in codegen workers) - #145815 (Wait for DPkg frontend lock when trying to remove packages) - #145821 (compiletest: if a compiler fails, show its output) - #145845 (Make `x test distcheck` self-contained) - #145847 (Don't show warnings from xcrun with -Zverbose-internals) - #145856 (Update books) - #145858 (Update wasm-component-ld dependency) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #143689 (Allow linking a prebuilt optimized compiler-rt builtins library) - #144885 (Implement some more checks in `ptr_guaranteed_cmp`. ) - #145535 (make rustdoc::invalid_html_tags more robust) - #145766 (test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved) - #145811 (Fix some minor issues in comments) - #145814 (Handle unwinding fatal errors in codegen workers) - #145815 (Wait for DPkg frontend lock when trying to remove packages) - #145821 (compiletest: if a compiler fails, show its output) - #145845 (Make `x test distcheck` self-contained) - #145847 (Don't show warnings from xcrun with -Zverbose-internals) - #145856 (Update books) - #145858 (Update wasm-component-ld dependency) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
Rollup merge of #145766 - epage:rustfmt, r=calebcartwright test(rustfmt): Verify frontmatter is preserved This is to prove that the frontmatter is preserved. The choices in tests is intended for showing the different parts of the proposed Style Guide for frontmatters (#145617). While rustfmt is developed in a different repo, work involving upstream integration is blocked on some work that is being finished up in that repo. I was told that it would be ok to post against this repo in the mean time. Tracking issue: #136889
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to prove that the frontmatter is preserved.
The choices in tests is intended for showing the different parts of the proposed Style Guide for frontmatters (#145617).
While rustfmt is developed in a different repo, work involving upstream integration is blocked on some work that is being finished up in that repo. I was told that it would be ok to post against this repo in the mean time.
Tracking issue: #136889