Skip to content

Conversation

@Sorunome
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@Half-Shot Half-Shot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool stuff, added a few things I'd like to see explained.

@Sorunome Sorunome changed the title MSC 2010: Add client-side spoilers MSC2010: Add client-side spoilers May 22, 2019
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal proposal-in-review labels May 22, 2019
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

@Sorunome please wrap lines at around 100 characters to make line-by-line review a bit easier, and resolve the threads which no longer apply

@anoadragon453
Copy link
Member

Looks pretty straight-forward to me, and essential for bridging other networks which include spoiler functionality, such as Discord. Thanks!

@mscbot fcp merge

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jun 21, 2019

Team member @anoadragon453 has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. disposition-merge labels Jun 21, 2019
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! It sucks that we can't use extensible events for this yet :(

@uhoreg
Copy link
Member

uhoreg commented Jun 24, 2019

Copy link
Member

@uhoreg uhoreg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good.

Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this seems like the best way of doing this - looks like there's a whole collection of different ways that people have done this for various forums etc (eg. pretending the <spoiler> tag is a thing or a blockquote with a custom class) but afaics there's no obvious prevailing one, so I think this is as good as any.

A comment on why the 'details' HTML element was rejected would be nice though (presumably we wanted something inline?)

@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Aug 16, 2019
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Aug 21, 2019

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot removed the final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. label Aug 21, 2019
@turt2live turt2live merged commit 8ca50ea into matrix-org:master Aug 21, 2019
@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec and removed finished-final-comment-period labels Aug 29, 2019
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

implementation: matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#3018

@Sorunome
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorunome commented Dec 8, 2019

This got merged without a sign-off, so here we go:

Signed-off-by: Sorunome [email protected]

@turt2live turt2live added the kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff label Apr 20, 2020
@turt2live turt2live self-assigned this May 15, 2020
turt2live added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
Spoilers MSC: #2010
`color` attribute MSC: #2422
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

turt2live commented May 15, 2020

Spec PR: #2549

@turt2live turt2live added spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review and removed spec-pr-missing Proposal has been implemented and is being used in the wild but hasn't yet been added to the spec labels May 15, 2020
turt2live added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
Original MSC: #2010

*Per the proposal process, MSC2010 has been modified to match this MSC.*
turt2live added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2021
@turt2live turt2live added merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! and removed spec-pr-in-review A proposal which has been PR'd against the spec and is in review labels Apr 6, 2021
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Merged 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

disposition-merge kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff merged A proposal whose PR has merged into the spec! proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants