Skip to content

Conversation

@charliermarsh
Copy link
Member

Summary

Per discussion on Discord, we're going to keep these names for now (changed in #8391 but not yet released) for compatibility. They're just cosmetic, but with the changes as-is, if you ran an older uv version over a newer lockfile...

  • For uv sync: the lockfile would be invalidated, and we'd re-resolve.
  • For uv sync --frozen: we'd silently skip the development dependencies.

We'll change these names in the future once we've added better error handling around lockfile versions (#8465).

@charliermarsh charliermarsh added the compatibility Compatibility with a specification or another tool label Oct 23, 2024
@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 70976ea into tracking/735 Oct 23, 2024
62 checks passed
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the charlie/rev branch October 23, 2024 13:32
zanieb added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…8599)

## Summary

Unfortunately, it looks like we lost
#8501 somewhere in a bad rebase.
This PR re-adds the change, with compatibility for those lockfiles
created in v0.4.27. I'm not certain we should actually merge this. It
might be less painful and confusing to just bite the bullet on the
change.

---------

Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compatibility Compatibility with a specification or another tool

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants