Add Aquality.Selenium.Images package to separate OpenCV dependency +semver: feature #264
Conversation
Update to Selenium 4.25.0
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Aquality.Selenium project, including an upgrade of the Visual Studio solution from version 16 to 17 and the addition of new projects, "Aquality.Selenium.Support" and "Aquality.Selenium.Images." These projects are configured for .NET Standard 2.0 and include essential metadata and dependencies. The existing Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj (2)
1-19: LGTM! Consider setting GeneratePackageOnBuild to true for local development.The project configuration and package metadata are well-defined. The use of .NET Standard 2.0 ensures broad compatibility.
Consider setting
GeneratePackageOnBuildtotruefor local development to streamline testing of package generation:- <GeneratePackageOnBuild>false</GeneratePackageOnBuild> + <GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>This change can be helpful during development but should be reverted before committing if you prefer to control package generation in your CI/CD pipeline.
21-24: Consider removing the NoWarn suppression for missing XML comments.While generating XML documentation is excellent for API documentation, suppressing warning 1591 might lead to incomplete documentation for public members.
To encourage comprehensive documentation, consider removing the NoWarn suppression:
<PropertyGroup> <DocumentationFile>Aquality.Selenium.Support.xml</DocumentationFile> - <NoWarn>1591</NoWarn> </PropertyGroup>This change will help ensure that all public members are properly documented.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.xml (3)
26-31: Consider adding an example value to the Threshold property documentation.The documentation for the Threshold property is clear and informative. To further enhance understanding, consider adding an example value.
Suggested improvement:
<summary> Threshold of image similarity. Should be a float between 0 and 1, where 1 means 100% match, and 0.5 means 50% match. +For example, a value of 0.8 would require an 80% match. </summary>
32-40: Consider clarifying the return value description for GetElementOnPoint method.The documentation for the GetElementOnPoint method is comprehensive. To improve clarity, consider expanding the description of the return value.
Suggested improvement:
<summary> Gets a single element on point (find by center coordinates, then select closest to matchLocation). </summary> <param name="matchLocation">Location of the upper-left point of the element.</param> <param name="context">Search context. If the searchContext is Locatable (like WebElement), will adjust coordinates to be absolute coordinates.</param> -<returns>The closest found element.</returns> +<returns>The IWebElement closest to the specified matchLocation.</returns>
49-56: Consider clarifying the Mat object in the GetScreenshot method documentation.The documentation for the GetScreenshot method is informative. To improve clarity for developers who might not be familiar with OpenCV, consider explaining what a Mat object is and its significance.
Suggested improvement:
<summary> Takes screenshot from searchContext if supported, or from browser. Performs screenshot scaling if devicePixelRatio != 1. </summary> <param name="context">Search context for element location.</param> -<returns>Captured screenshot as Mat object.</returns> +<returns>Captured screenshot as a Mat object (OpenCV's basic image container).</returns>Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.csproj (1)
Line range hint
1-101: Summary of changes and verification neededThe changes in this file contribute to the PR objectives by:
- Updating Aquality.Selenium.Core to version 3.1.2
- Removing OpenCvSharp package references (not visible in this diff, but mentioned in the AI summary)
- Adding README.md as a packable item for improved documentation
These changes align with the goal of separating the OpenCV dependency. However, the Selenium update to version 4.25.0 mentioned in the PR objectives is not visible in this file. Please ensure this update has been made in the appropriate location and provide the relevant file for review if necessary.
Consider adding a comment in the project file or updating the PR description to explain the rationale behind removing the OpenCvSharp dependencies and where the Selenium update is implemented. This will help future maintainers understand the architectural decisions made in this PR.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Locators/ByImage.cs (1)
Line range hint
46-75: Consider optimizing theFindElementsmethod for performance.The current implementation of
FindElementsis correct, but there might be room for performance optimization, especially when dealing with large screenshots or multiple matches.Consider the following optimizations:
- Use
Cv2.MinMaxLocwith a mask to avoid the need for drawing black rectangles:var mask = new Mat(result.Rows, result.Cols, MatType.CV_8UC1, Scalar.White); while (matchCounter > 0 && maxVal >= Threshold) { matchCounter--; matchLocations.Add(matchLocation); Cv2.Rectangle(mask, new Rect(matchLocation.X, matchLocation.Y, template.Width, template.Height), Scalar.Black, -1); Cv2.MinMaxLoc(result, out _, out maxVal, out _, out matchLocation, mask); }
- Consider using
Cv2.ThresholdBinaryto find all matches at once, which could be faster for images with many matches:Cv2.Threshold(result, result, Threshold, 1.0, ThresholdTypes.Binary); Cv2.FindNonZero(result, out var matches); var matchLocations = matches.Select(m => m.Point).ToList();These optimizations could potentially improve performance, especially for complex scenarios. However, please benchmark these changes to ensure they provide a meaningful improvement for your specific use cases.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.sln (3 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.xml (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Locators/ByImage.cs (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.csproj (3 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.xml (0 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/ImageLocatorTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/TestApp/TheInternet/Forms/BrokenImagesForm.cs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.xml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/ImageLocatorTests.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (22)
Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/TestApp/TheInternet/Forms/BrokenImagesForm.cs (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The addition of
using Aquality.Selenium.Support.Locators;aligns with the PR objective of introducing the Aquality.Selenium.Support package. This change effectively separates the OpenCV dependency as intended.To ensure consistency, let's verify that this change has been applied across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified! All references to
ByImageare correctly using theAquality.Selenium.Support.Locatorsnamespace, with no remaining references to the old namespace.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Aquality.Selenium.Support.Locators across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to the old namespace echo "Checking for old namespace references:" rg "using.*ByImage" --type cs | grep -v "Aquality.Selenium.Support.Locators" # Test 2: Verify the new namespace is used where ByImage is referenced echo "Verifying new namespace usage:" rg "ByImage" --type cs -C 5Length of output: 11774
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj (2)
26-40: LGTM! Proper project reference and inclusion of essential files.The project reference to Aquality.Selenium and the inclusion of LICENSE and README.md files in the package are appropriate and follow good practices for .NET package creation.
1-50: LGTM! Well-structured and complete project file.The overall structure and content of the project file follow best practices for .NET package creation. It includes all necessary elements such as project SDK, target framework, package metadata, documentation settings, project references, and package dependencies.
Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csproj (4)
Line range hint
1-62: Summary of review for Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csprojThe changes in this file contribute to the PR objectives by:
- Updating the Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk package to a newer version.
- Adding a reference to the new Aquality.Selenium.Support project.
These changes appear to be in line with the goal of separating the OpenCV dependency and updating the project structure. However, some aspects of the PR objectives and AI summary are not visible in this file, and clarification has been requested.
Next steps:
- Address the clarification requests regarding the Selenium library update and JavaScript resource file changes.
- Verify that the new project structure works as intended, especially concerning the separation of the OpenCV dependency.
- Ensure all tests pass with the updated package versions and project references.
Once these steps are completed, the changes in this file can be considered ready for merge, pending the resolution of the clarification requests.
Line range hint
1-62: Request for clarification on PR objectives and changesWhile reviewing this file, I noticed some discrepancies between the PR objectives, the AI-generated summary, and the visible changes:
- The PR objectives mention updating the Selenium library to version 4.25.0, but this change is not visible in the current file.
- The AI summary mentions removal of JavaScript resource files, but this is not reflected in the provided code.
To address these discrepancies, please run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Selenium version update and JavaScript resource file changes # Check for Selenium version update rg -i "selenium.*4\.25\.0" $(fd -e csproj) # Check for removed JavaScript files git diff --name-status $(git merge-base HEAD main) HEAD | rg "\.js$"Could you please clarify:
- In which file(s) is the Selenium library version update implemented?
- Were any JavaScript resource files actually removed, and if so, in which commit?
This information will help ensure that all PR objectives are met and that the changes are accurately represented in the review.
37-37: LGTM: Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk package version updateThe update from version 17.11.0 to 17.11.1 is a minor version increment, which typically includes bug fixes and small improvements. This change aligns with good practices of keeping dependencies up-to-date.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all tests pass with this new version. Run the following command to check for any breaking changes or deprecations:
✅ Verification successful
The update to Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk version 17.11.1 has been successfully verified. All package references are correctly updated, and no warnings or deprecations related to this package were found.
- Package References:
- nunit 4.2.2
- NUnit3TestAdapter 4.6.0
- Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk 17.11.1
No further action is required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes or deprecations in Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk # Search for any warnings or errors related to Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk rg -i "Microsoft\.NET\.Test\.Sdk" $(fd -e log -e txt)Length of output: 933
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility of Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk version 17.11.1 # Check the csproj file for any deprecated or breaking changes related to Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk rg -i '<PackageReference Include="Microsoft\.NET\.Test\.Sdk" Version="17\.11\.1" />' Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csproj # Optionally, list all PackageReferences to ensure no other related packages are affected rg '<PackageReference Include=' Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csprojLength of output: 554
41-41: LGTM: Addition of Aquality.Selenium.Support project referenceThe addition of the Aquality.Selenium.Support project reference aligns with the PR objective of introducing the Aquality.Selenium.Support package to separate the OpenCV dependency.
To ensure the project structure is correct, please run the following command:
This will verify the existence of the new project file and check for any OpenCV-related references, helping to confirm that the OpenCV dependency has been properly separated.
✅ Verification successful
✅ Verified: OpenCV dependencies successfully moved to Aquality.Selenium.Support
The main
Aquality.Selenium.csprojno longer contains any OpenCV-related references, ensuring that all OpenCV dependencies have been properly segregated into theAquality.Selenium.Supportproject.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and structure of the Aquality.Selenium.Support project # Check if the project file exists if [ -f "src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj" ]; then echo "Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj exists." # Check for OpenCV related references or imports rg -i "opencv" "src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj" # List the contents of the project directory ls -R "src/Aquality.Selenium.Support" else echo "Error: Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj not found." fiLength of output: 933
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and verify the Aquality.Selenium.Support project # Find the path to Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj project_path=$(fd "Aquality\.Selenium\.Support\.csproj" . -e csproj | head -n 1) if [ -z "$project_path" ]; then echo "Error: Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj not found in the repository." exit 1 else echo "Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj found at: $project_path" # Check for OpenCV related references or imports rg -i "opencv" "$project_path" # Get the directory containing the project file project_dir=$(dirname "$project_path") # List the contents of the project directory ls -R "$project_dir" fiLength of output: 1546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that OpenCV dependencies have been removed from the main Aquality.Selenium project # Find the main Aquality.Selenium.csproj file main_project_path=$(fd "Aquality\.Selenium\.csproj" . -e csproj | head -n 1) if [ -z "$main_project_path" ]; then echo "Error: Aquality.Selenium.csproj not found in the repository." exit 1 else echo "Aquality.Selenium.csproj found at: $main_project_path" # Check for OpenCV related references or imports rg -i "opencv" "$main_project_path" fiLength of output: 521
Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.sln (5)
3-4: Visual Studio version update looks good.The update to Visual Studio 17 (version 17.8.34309.116) is a positive change. It allows the project to leverage the latest features and improvements provided by the newer Visual Studio version.
14-15: New project "Aquality.Selenium.Support" added successfully.The addition of the "Aquality.Selenium.Support" project to the solution is in line with the PR objectives. This new project will help separate the OpenCV dependency as intended.
30-33: Project configuration for "Aquality.Selenium.Support" is correct.The build configurations for the new "Aquality.Selenium.Support" project are properly set up for both Debug and Release modes, mirroring the configuration of existing projects in the solution.
41-41: Nested project structure is maintained.The new "Aquality.Selenium.Support" project is correctly added to the "src" folder in the solution structure. This maintains the existing organization and is appropriate for a support library.
Line range hint
1-46: Solution file changes align well with PR objectives.The changes to the solution file successfully accomplish the following:
- Update the Visual Studio version to 17.8.34309.116.
- Add the new "Aquality.Selenium.Support" project to separate the OpenCV dependency.
- Configure the new project with appropriate build settings.
- Maintain the existing solution structure by placing the new project in the "src" folder.
These changes are consistent with the PR objectives and contribute to the goal of separating the OpenCV dependency into a support package.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.xml (5)
1-5: LGTM: Assembly name is correctly specified.The assembly name "Aquality.Selenium.Support" is consistent with the new project mentioned in the PR objectives.
7-13: LGTM: Clear and informative class summary.The summary for the
ByImageclass provides a concise explanation of its functionality, including the use of OpenCV for image matching and JavaScript for coordinate determination.
14-19: LGTM: Constructor documentation is clear and accurate.The documentation for the constructor accepting a
FileInfoparameter is concise and informative.
20-25: LGTM: Constructor documentation is clear and accurate.The documentation for the constructor accepting a byte array parameter is concise and informative.
1-58: Overall, the documentation is well-structured and comprehensive.The XML documentation for the Aquality.Selenium.Support assembly, particularly for the ByImage class and its members, is of high quality. It provides valuable information for developers using this library. The suggested minor improvements will further enhance its clarity and usefulness.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.csproj (3)
17-17: LGTM: Addition of PackageReadmeFileThe inclusion of README.md as the package readme file is a good practice. It enhances the documentation available to users of the package.
45-48: LGTM: Inclusion of README.md in packageThe addition of README.md to the ItemGroup with Pack set to True ensures that the readme file is included in the package. This change complements the PackageReadmeFile element added earlier.
94-94: Verify Selenium update and approve package changesThe update of Aquality.Selenium.Core to version 3.1.2 is approved. The removal of OpenCvSharp package references (not visible in this diff) aligns with the PR objective of separating the OpenCV dependency.
However, the PR objectives mention updating Selenium to version 4.25.0, which is not visible in this file. Please verify that this update has been made in the appropriate file.
To verify the Selenium update, please run the following command:
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Locators/ByImage.cs (2)
Line range hint
1-190: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives, implementation is solid.The changes made to this file, particularly the namespace change, align well with the PR objectives of separating the OpenCV dependency. The existing implementation of the
ByImageclass is solid and well-structured, providing a robust solution for image-based element location.While no critical issues were found, we've suggested:
- Verifying the impact of the namespace change on the rest of the codebase.
- Considering performance optimizations for the
FindElementsmethod, especially for complex scenarios.These suggestions aim to ensure smooth integration of the changes and potentially improve performance in certain use cases.
11-11: Approve namespace change and verify its impact.The namespace change from
Aquality.Selenium.Elements.InterfacestoAquality.Selenium.Support.Locatorsis appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of separating the OpenCV dependency. This new namespace better reflects the purpose of theByImageclass as a locator.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old namespace:
If any results are found, they will need to be updated to use the new namespace.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Support/Aquality.Selenium.Support.csproj
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.csproj (2)
1-19: LGTM! Minor suggestion for consistency.The project configuration and package properties are well-defined. The use of .NET Standard 2.0 ensures broad compatibility.
Consider standardizing indentation throughout the file. Some lines use spaces, while others use tabs. For consistency, it's recommended to use either spaces or tabs uniformly.
21-24: Consider removing XML documentation warning suppression.While generating XML documentation is good practice, suppressing warning 1591 (missing XML comment) might lead to incomplete documentation for public members.
Consider removing the
<NoWarn>1591</NoWarn>line and addressing any resulting warnings by adding XML comments to public members. This ensures comprehensive API documentation.Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.xml (5)
14-19: Consider adding more details to the constructor documentation.While the current documentation is clear, it could be enhanced by providing information about the expected image file format (e.g., PNG, JPEG) and any size or resolution restrictions. This additional information would help users understand the requirements for the image files they provide.
20-25: Consider adding more details to the constructor documentation.The current documentation is clear, but it could be improved by providing information about the expected format of the byte array (e.g., raw image data, specific encoding) and any size or resolution restrictions. This additional information would help users understand how to properly prepare the image data they provide.
32-40: Consider clarifying the method behavior for edge cases.The documentation provides a good overview of the
GetElementOnPointmethod. However, it could be improved by addressing the following points:
- Clarify what "closest to matchLocation" means in the context of selecting an element.
- Explain how the method behaves if multiple elements are found at the same point.
- Describe what happens if no element is found at the specified point.
Adding this information would help users better understand the method's behavior in various scenarios.
41-48: Consider adding more details about distance calculation.The documentation for the
DistanceToPointmethod is clear and concise. To further improve it, consider specifying:
- From which part of the element the distance is calculated (e.g., center, top-left corner).
- Whether the distance is Euclidean, Manhattan, or another type of distance.
This additional information would provide a more complete understanding of the method's behavior.
49-56: Consider clarifying the return type and its usage.The documentation for the
GetScreenshotmethod is informative. To enhance it further:
- Explain what a Mat object is (e.g., "Mat is an OpenCV class representing an n-dimensional dense array used for storing images").
- Briefly mention how the Mat object can be used or converted for further processing.
This additional context would help users understand the method's output and how to work with it.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Locators/ByImage.cs (1)
Line range hint
41-68: Consider caching for performance optimization.The
FindElementsmethod performs image processing operations which can be computationally expensive, especially if called frequently. Consider implementing a caching mechanism for the processed images or match results to improve performance in scenarios where the same image is used multiple times.Here's a simple example of how you might implement caching:
private static readonly Dictionary<string, ReadOnlyCollection<IWebElement>> _cache = new Dictionary<string, ReadOnlyCollection<IWebElement>>(); public override ReadOnlyCollection<IWebElement> FindElements(ISearchContext context) { var cacheKey = $"{context.GetHashCode()}_{ToString()}"; if (_cache.TryGetValue(cacheKey, out var cachedElements)) { return cachedElements; } // Existing implementation... var result = matchLocations.Select(match => GetElementOnPoint(match, context)).ToList().AsReadOnly(); _cache[cacheKey] = result; return result; }Note: Ensure to clear the cache when necessary, such as when the page content changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.sln (3 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.csproj (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.xml (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Locators/ByImage.cs (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/TestApp/Browser/ChromeDownloadsForm.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Aquality.Selenium/Aquality.Selenium.sln
- Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/TestApp/Browser/ChromeDownloadsForm.cs (1)
13-13: Verify the reliability of the new shadow root locatorThe
NestedShadowRootLocatorproperty has been updated to use a CSS selector for "cr-toolbar" instead of the previous ID-based selector for "moreActionsMenu". This change affects how the form interacts with UI elements in the shadow DOM of the Chrome downloads interface.
- Please verify that the new locator
By.CssSelector("cr-toolbar")is reliable across different versions of Chrome and in various scenarios.- Update any related tests that might be affected by this change to ensure they still pass with the new locator.
- Review and update any documentation that references the old locator or describes the structure of the Chrome downloads page.
- Check other parts of the codebase for any dependencies on the old "moreActionsMenu" locator and update them accordingly.
To help verify the reliability of the new locator, you can run the following script to check for its usage across the codebase:
This will help ensure that the change has been consistently applied throughout the project.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: New locator is correctly implemented and old locator is removed
The
NestedShadowRootLocatorproperty has been successfully updated to useBy.CssSelector("cr-toolbar"). No instances of the old locatorBy.Id("moreActionsMenu")were found in the codebase, ensuring that the change is consistent and does not affect other parts of the project.
- File with new locator:
Aquality.Selenium/tests/Aquality.Selenium.Tests/Integration/TestApp/Browser/ChromeDownloadsForm.cs🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new locator and potential remnants of the old one echo "Checking for usage of the new 'cr-toolbar' locator:" rg --type csharp "By\.CssSelector\(\"cr-toolbar\"\)" echo "\nChecking for any remaining usage of the old 'moreActionsMenu' locator:" rg --type csharp "By\.Id\(\"moreActionsMenu\"\)"Length of output: 562
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new 'cr-toolbar' locator and verify absence of the 'moreActionsMenu' locator echo "Checking for usage of the new 'cr-toolbar' locator:" rg --type csharp 'By\.CssSelector\("cr-toolbar"\)' echo "\nChecking for any remaining usage of the old 'moreActionsMenu' locator:" rg --type csharp 'By\.Id\("moreActionsMenu"\)'Length of output: 562
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.csproj (2)
26-40: LGTM! Good inclusion of project reference and documentation.The project reference to Aquality.Selenium and the inclusion of LICENSE and README.md files in the package are appropriate and follow good practices.
1-50: LGTM! Overall structure is sound.The project file is well-structured and includes all necessary elements for a .NET project. It correctly defines metadata, references, and package information.
Remember to address the previous comments, particularly:
- Standardizing indentation
- Reconsidering the suppression of XML documentation warnings
- Aligning OpenCvSharp4 package versions
Once these are addressed, the project file will be in excellent shape.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.xml (3)
7-13: LGTM: Clear and concise class documentation.The documentation for the
ByImageclass provides a comprehensive overview of its functionality, explaining the key steps in the element location process.
26-31: LGTM: Clear and informative property documentation.The documentation for the
Thresholdproperty effectively explains its purpose, expected range, and provides helpful examples to illustrate the meaning of different threshold values.
1-58: Overall, well-structured and informative documentation.The XML documentation for the
Aquality.Selenium.Imagesassembly is comprehensive and provides valuable information about theByImageclass and its members. The documentation is clear, concise, and covers the essential aspects of each member.To further enhance the documentation:
- Consider addressing the suggested improvements for each member, particularly adding more details about parameter formats, method behaviors in edge cases, and clarifying technical terms.
- Ensure consistency in the level of detail provided across all members.
- Review the documentation for any typos or grammatical issues (none were found in this review, but it's always good practice).
Implementing these suggestions will result in even more robust and user-friendly documentation, which is crucial for the adoption and correct usage of the
ByImagelocator in the Aquality Selenium framework.Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Locators/ByImage.cs (3)
Line range hint
34-34: Approve virtual Threshold property.Making the
Thresholdproperty virtual is a good improvement. It allows for more flexibility in derived classes to customize the threshold behavior if needed.
Line range hint
37-39: Approve exception handling in FindElement.The addition of throwing a
NoSuchElementExceptionwhen no elements are found is consistent with Selenium's behavior and improves the method's reliability.
11-11: Approve namespace change and verify usage.The namespace change from
Aquality.Selenium.Elements.InterfacestoAquality.Selenium.Support.Locatorsaligns well with the PR objective of separating the OpenCV dependency. This is a good architectural decision.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any usages of the old namespace:
If any results are found, they will need to be updated to use the new namespace.
Aquality.Selenium/src/Aquality.Selenium.Images/Aquality.Selenium.Images.csproj
Show resolved
Hide resolved
mialeska
changed the title
|
Update to Selenium 4.25.0