forked from solana-labs/solana
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 801
Remove shrink_to_fit from InMemAccountsIndex eviction #8823
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you look up why this was added in the first place? I don't want to remove this until I understand why it was added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
solana-labs#23795
This was added in the above PR when we switched to chunked eviction, but it doesn’t seem necessary there either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that PR (solana-labs#23795), the if-empty-then-shrink block is in both sides of the diff, so I don't think that's the PR that introduced the shrink-to-fit originally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that makes sense — this was added back when we introduced the disk index in 2021.
At that time, we built the index fully in memory first and then flushed it to disk, so the shrink_to_fit() was needed to trim the in-memory map after the flush.
In today’s code, though, we flush directly to disk during startup, and the in-memory map should always be empty. So the shrink is no longer necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, and that matches up with why this code existed in the first place. Thanks for finding the original PR again.
Can you run this PR on a validator, with disk index enabled, and share the index memory usage + validator memory usage, please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Around 10:40 is the restart of the validator with this PR + disk-index enabled.
Before it was running with threshold index flush (50M).
With disk-index, it used less memory and has less hashmap count as usual.
Therefore, remove this shrink has no impact for disk-index.