Skip to content

Conversation

@Sergio0694
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive pull-request title
  • I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
  • I have verified that I am following matches the existing coding patterns and practice as demonstrated in the repository. These follow strict Stylecop rules 👮.
  • I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Small follow-up for SixLabors/SharedInfrastructure#12 for the ImageSharp-specific Guard API.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1333 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1333   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.77%   82.77%           
=======================================
  Files         690      690           
  Lines       30973    30973           
  Branches     3511     3511           
=======================================
  Hits        25639    25639           
  Misses       4613     4613           
  Partials      721      721           
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 82.77% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ade5ba5...e7e4c8d. Read the comment docs.

@JimBobSquarePants JimBobSquarePants merged commit fd05204 into master Sep 1, 2020
@JimBobSquarePants JimBobSquarePants deleted the sp/guard-codegen-improvement branch September 1, 2020 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants