Skip to content

Conversation

@james-prysm
Copy link
Contributor

@james-prysm james-prysm commented Jun 7, 2024

What type of PR is this?

Other

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

  • renames DepositReceipt to DepositRequest
  • renames ExecutionLayerWithdrawalRequest to WithdrawalRequest
  • renames ValidatorPublicKey to ValidatorPubkey on execution API

missing

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

dependent on following PRs merged and released
ethereum/consensus-specs#3757
ethereum/consensus-specs#3791
ethereum/execution-apis#549
ethereum/consensus-specs#3786

Other notes for review

t.Run(folder.Name(), func(t *testing.T) {
folderPath := path.Join(testsFolderPath, folder.Name())
executionLayerWithdrawalRequestFile, err := util.BazelFileBytes(folderPath, "execution_layer_withdrawal_request.ssz_snappy")
withdrawalRequestFile, err := util.BazelFileBytes(folderPath, "execution_layer_withdrawal_request.ssz_snappy")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

spect test folder should be updated if renamed

@james-prysm james-prysm requested review from kasey and removed request for rauljordan June 7, 2024 19:49
@james-prysm james-prysm marked this pull request as draft June 7, 2024 21:11
@james-prysm james-prysm marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2024 16:52
tests/minimal/eip6110/ssz_static/Deposit
tests/minimal/eip6110/ssz_static/DepositData
tests/minimal/eip6110/ssz_static/DepositMessage
tests/minimal/eip6110/ssz_static/DepositReceipt
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you don't want to touch these exclusions until the spectests have been updated. Otherwise the spectest compliance report tool will complain these tests are missing

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will add back in then

prestonvanloon
prestonvanloon previously approved these changes Jun 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@james-prysm james-prysm enabled auto-merge June 12, 2024 13:41
@james-prysm james-prysm added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 3413d05 Jun 12, 2024
@james-prysm james-prysm deleted the electra-execution-renames branch June 12, 2024 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants