You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Note that this shouldn't be merged yet, as it has dependencies on packages that are still being built in #897 (LLVM and numba), but I'm just giving it a try here already to make sure that it indeed fixes the issue.
If it works, we may want to consider doing a rebuild for the other CPU targets (though I'm not sure if it really changes much).
New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-sapphire_rapids for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.01/pr_898/42996
date
job status
comment
Jan 27 11:04:33 UTC 2025
submitted
job id 42996 awaits release by job manager
Jan 27 11:05:29 UTC 2025
released
job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 27 11:11:38 UTC 2025
running
job 42996 is running
Jan 27 11:38:31 UTC 2025
finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-42996.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-sapphire_rapids-1737977335.tar.gzsize: 136 MiB (143612249 bytes) entries: 3993 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids/modules/all
Based on the contents of the librosa installation directory, I don't think we need to rebuild this for the other architectures. This is in $EBROOTLIBROSA/0.10.1-foss-2023a/lib/python3.11/site-packages, and it's the same for the zen3 installation:
A diff -ru on the soxr (which is the extension that actually failed to build in #897) directories mostly shows differences due to the installation prefix, and a change in some binary files (but that's expected, since it's also the case for, for instance, skylake_avx512 vs zen3).
New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for CPU micro-architecture x86_64-intel-sapphire_rapids for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software in job dir /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.01/pr_898/42997
date
job status
comment
Jan 27 20:14:14 UTC 2025
submitted
job id 42997 awaits release by job manager
Jan 27 20:15:00 UTC 2025
released
job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 27 20:21:07 UTC 2025
running
job 42997 is running
Jan 27 20:34:34 UTC 2025
finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-42997.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-sapphire_rapids-1738009539.tar.gzsize: 5 MiB (5286326 bytes) entries: 234 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids/modules/all
librosa/0.10.1-foss-2023a.lua
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids/software
librosa/0.10.1-foss-2023a
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids
no other files in tarball
Jan 27 20:34:34 UTC 2025
test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] (1/9) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: perf: 682.06 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (2/9) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 1.89 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (3/9) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 1.74 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (4/9) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 3.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (5/9) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 3.8 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (6/9) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 0.37 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (7/9) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: latency: 0.34 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (8/9) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: bandwidth: 13852.1 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (9/9) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86-64-intel-srapids-node+default P: bandwidth: 13836.02 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 9/9 test case(s) from 9 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-42997.out ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case
Jan 28 09:30:45 UTC 2025
uploaded
transfer of eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-sapphire_rapids-1738009539.tar.gz to S3 bucket succeeded
PR merged! Moved ['/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.01/pr_898/42996', '/project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.01/pr_898/42997'] to /project/def-users/SHARED/trash_bin/EESSI/software-layer/2025.01.28
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The build of librosa with EB 4.9.2 failed in #897 (comment), but a newer version of the easyconfig is available in 4.9.4, and it should fix this issue (see easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#21434).
Note that this shouldn't be merged yet, as it has dependencies on packages that are still being built in #897 (LLVM and numba), but I'm just giving it a try here already to make sure that it indeed fixes the issue.
If it works, we may want to consider doing a rebuild for the other CPU targets (though I'm not sure if it really changes much).