Skip to content

Conversation

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres commented Oct 10, 2025

Part of #387

Screenshot 2025-10-10 at 4 51 33 PM

Preview | Diff

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2025 08:41
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2025 08:41
Fix spec references to point to lastest.
Copy link
Contributor

@mohamedamir mohamedamir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres changed the title Editorial: add index section Editorial: add Index section Oct 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@timcappalli timcappalli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, this should be in every spec so approving on that basis.

But it doesn't change the desire for #387 / #352 to improve readability for consumers of the spec.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Right, it’s just part of addressing #352

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres merged commit 5de949c into main Oct 11, 2025
2 checks passed
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres deleted the index branch October 11, 2025 07:33
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
SHA: 5de949c
Reason: push, by marcoscaceres

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
mohamedamir pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
mohamedamir pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants