Return null if Redbox has no component stack
#75744
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
and stop waiting for it. The util is supposed to be called after `assertHasRedbox` (hence the "get" prefix). Waiting just makes failing tests slower.
Member
Author
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
eps1lon
requested review from
gaojude and
huozhi
and removed request for
gaojude
gaojude
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
eps1lon
deleted the
sebbie/02-06-return_null_if_redbox_has_no_component_stack
branch
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... and stop waiting for it. The util is supposed to be called after
assertHasRedbox(hence the "get" prefix). Waiting just makes failing tests slower.