Skip to content

Conversation

@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor

@sonnens sonnens commented Apr 30, 2025

Summary

Adds a new source to consume the Okta system log / audit log

Change Type

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Non-functional (chore, refactoring, docs)
  • Performance

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

How did you test this PR?

Tests are included in the PR, and I've run it on our own Okta instance

Does this PR include user facing changes?

  • Yes. Please add a changelog fragment based on our guidelines.
  • No. A maintainer will apply the "no-changelog" label to this PR.

References

@sonnens sonnens requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2025 15:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added the domain: sources Anything related to the Vector's sources label Apr 30, 2025
@pront pront self-assigned this Apr 30, 2025
@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor Author

sonnens commented May 19, 2025

@pront anything needed on my end for this one?

@pront
Copy link
Member

pront commented May 19, 2025

@pront anything needed on my end for this one?

Hi @sonnens, and thank you for this PR! We want a few more docs files. You can look at other PRs for inspiration: https://github.com/vectordotdev/vector/pull/22609/files.

Note that make generate-component-docs will generate the files under base/ but the other CUE file needs to be handwritten.

@sonnens sonnens requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2025 20:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added the domain: external docs Anything related to Vector's external, public documentation label May 19, 2025
@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor Author

sonnens commented May 19, 2025

@pront something like this work?

Copy link
Contributor

@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 I left a couple small docs suggestions

@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor Author

sonnens commented Jun 16, 2025

@pront any updates?

@pront
Copy link
Member

pront commented Jun 17, 2025

@pront any updates?

Hi @sonnens, I was away for a few weeks. We will take a look soon.

@pront pront requested a review from thomasqueirozb June 17, 2025 15:02
@pront pront added the meta: awaiting author Pull requests that are awaiting their author. label Jun 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the meta: awaiting author Pull requests that are awaiting their author. label Jun 30, 2025
@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor Author

sonnens commented Jun 30, 2025

@pront moved around the lock guard & cleaned up the error handling (I was cribbing off other sources 🤷‍♀️)

@sonnens sonnens requested a review from pront June 30, 2025 23:46
Copy link
Member

@pront pront left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks mostly good!

Did you have a chance to test this E2E after the lock changes?

Copy link
Member

@pront pront left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks mostly good!

Did you have a chance to test this E2E after the lock changes?

@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb added the meta: awaiting author Pull requests that are awaiting their author. label Jul 7, 2025
@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb added the source: new A request for a new source label Aug 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests are failing. I checked out to commit ed601dc (which was the last commit you authored) and tests are still failing on that commit.

@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb added the meta: awaiting author Pull requests that are awaiting their author. label Aug 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the meta: awaiting author Pull requests that are awaiting their author. label Aug 26, 2025
@sonnens sonnens requested a review from thomasqueirozb August 26, 2025 20:07
@sonnens
Copy link
Contributor Author

sonnens commented Aug 26, 2025

@thomasqueirozb I'm not sure why check-docs is failing in CI , but I fixed the tests

Copy link
Contributor

@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go, thanks!

@thomasqueirozb thomasqueirozb added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into vectordotdev:master with commit 56eee56 Aug 29, 2025
69 checks passed
@sonnens sonnens deleted the source_okta branch October 24, 2025 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

domain: external docs Anything related to Vector's external, public documentation domain: sources Anything related to the Vector's sources source: new A request for a new source source: okta

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Okta system log source

4 participants