CLDR-18871 Create new locale, Interslavic, isv

[conradarcturus]

CLDR-18871

• This PR completes the ticket.

ALLOW_MANY_COMMITS=true

[jira-pull-request-webhook]

Notice: the branch changed across the force-push!

• common/main/isv_Cyrl.xml is different

View Diff Across Force-Push

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[DavidLRowe]

I think the colon after the ticket number (at the beginning of the commit message) is causing problems.

I think it may be too early to include "isv" in en.xml. @srl295: Correct me if I'm wrong!

IIUC the locale needs to have been in CLDR at Basic level already in order to qualify for addition to en.xml, which would then be done at the beginning of the next even-numbered cycle. Thus, assuming isv gets to Basic in v50, at the beginning of v52 "isv" would be added to en.xml and picked up by other locals for localization.

[DavidLRowe]

Other files look okay, though I'm not qualified to comment about GenerateLikelySubtags.java‎. (@srl295 ?)

[jira-pull-request-webhook]

Hooray! The files in the branch are the same across the force-push. 😃

~ Your Friendly Jira-GitHub PR Checker Bot

[conradarcturus]

I think the colon after the ticket number (at the beginning of the commit message) is causing problems.

oh! I suspect you are right

I think it may be too early to include "isv" in en.xml. @srl295: Correct me if I'm wrong!

IIUC the locale needs to have been in CLDR at Basic level already in order to qualify for addition to en.xml, which would then be done at the beginning of the next even-numbered cycle. Thus, assuming isv gets to Basic in v50, at the beginning of v52 "isv" would be added to en.xml and picked up by other locals for localization.

I don't think its ever too early to include it. Adding it here means it can be localized but it doesn't require it. It's only required to be translated if we update coverageLevels.xml. I think it's a better practice to add it immediately when we add the locale.