Skip to content

ci: coverage workflow pre-build fix #931

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

ci: coverage workflow pre-build fix #931

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

@da2ce7
Copy link
Contributor

@da2ce7 da2ce7 commented Jul 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

closes #904

@da2ce7 da2ce7 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2024 07:10
@da2ce7
Copy link
Contributor Author

da2ce7 commented Jul 1, 2024

ACK 69f40fc

@josecelano
Copy link
Member

josecelano commented Jul 1, 2024

Hi, @da2ce7. Is this PR the patch to this issue?

@josecelano
Copy link
Member

josecelano commented Jul 1, 2024

Hi, @da2ce7. Is this PR the patch to this issue?

Or was this 5f3957a?

@josecelano josecelano added the Needs Rebase Base Branch has Incompatibilities label Jul 1, 2024
@da2ce7
Copy link
Contributor Author

da2ce7 commented Jul 1, 2024

@josecelano if it works it should close #904

@da2ce7 da2ce7 force-pushed the 20240701_coverage_workflow_fix_try_5 branch from 69f40fc to daeb7cc Compare July 1, 2024 08:25
@da2ce7
Copy link
Contributor Author

da2ce7 commented Jul 1, 2024

ACK daeb7cc

@da2ce7 da2ce7 merged commit d4e3208 into torrust:develop Jul 1, 2024
@da2ce7 da2ce7 removed the Needs Rebase Base Branch has Incompatibilities label Jul 1, 2024
@da2ce7 da2ce7 mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Running unit test in coverage workflow is failing

2 participants

@da2ce7 @josecelano