Update minimum value for ton forward #1451
Conversation
|
|
||
| :::caution Transaction notification | ||
| Each service in the ecosystem is expected to set `forward_ton_amount` to 0.000000001 TON (1 nanoton) when withdrawing a token to send a jetton Notify on [successful transfer](https://testnet.tonviewer.com/transaction/a0eede398d554318326b6e13081c2441f8b9a814bf9704e2e2f44f24adb3d407), otherwise the transfer will not be compliant. It will not be able to be processed by other CEXs and services. | ||
| Each service in the ecosystem is expected to set `forward_ton_amount` to 0.001 TON when withdrawing a token to send a jetton Notify on [successful transfer](https://testnet.tonviewer.com/transaction/a0eede398d554318326b6e13081c2441f8b9a814bf9704e2e2f44f24adb3d407), otherwise the transfer will not be compliant. It will not be able to be processed by other CEXs and services. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you think about totally removing this sentence? It is misleading
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which one of the sentences do you mean? We need all CEX to send a notification message for precise event tracking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Shvandre could you take a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Totally incomprehensible what services is meant to set fwdTonAmount. Any? Of course not, because setting ANY fwdTonAmount is compliant with TEP-74 standard.
when withdrawing a token
Withdrawing from where? Usually when you withdraw something means you will receive an asset on your wallet as the result. The fwdTonAmount makes nothing in this case, it can be set to any amount.
otherwise the transfer will not be compliant. It will not be able to be processed by other CEXs and services.
That is the pure lie. This transfer will be compliant with TEP-74. Moreover, it will be processed by most CEX-es.
Moreover, IIRC tonkeeper sets fwdTonAmount to 1 nanoton, when doing regular Jetton transfers from wallet. Does that mean it’s a poorly designed wallet?
|
Outdated |
Description
PR Description:
Increasing
forward_ton_amountto 0.001 TON is required to improve deposit processing for Jetton, NFT, etc. Currently, sending 1 nanoton results in unnecessary storage fee deductions on the destination address, which may freeze the destination address if the balance is low and there's been no recent activity. Also as the notify message arrives with insufficient funds to execute TVM it is impossible to do processing with the contract which hurts DeXes for example. This change partially resolves both issues, ensuring reliable contract execution and preventing unnecessary address freezes.Checklist