-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
feat(tests): add new equality assertions for enums and custom value types #3390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job Code Review for PR #3390Reviewing: feat(tests): add new equality assertions for enums and custom value types Todo List:
SummaryThis PR fixes issue #3387 by adjusting the ✅ Positive FindingsExcellent Test Coverage
Well-Designed Test Structure
Code Quality
|
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅Reviewing PR #3390 - "feat(tests): add new equality assertions for enums and custom value types" Todo List:
Review SummaryThis PR adds comprehensive test coverage for enum and custom value type equality assertions, along with a critical fix to method overload resolution priorities. Overall, this is a solid contribution that improves test coverage and fixes a potential type resolution issue. ✅ Positive Findings1. Comprehensive Test Coverage
2. Critical Bug Fix
3. Code Quality
4. Proper API Changes
🔍 Technical AnalysisTest Structure (EnumTests.cs:172-289)The new tests cover:
Priority Fix (AssertionExtensions.cs:211,227)// OLD: [OverloadResolutionPriority(1)] // Would take precedence over generic
// NEW: [OverloadResolutionPriority(-1)] // Only used for cross-type scenariosThis change ensures that:
⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security Assessment
📋 Minor Suggestions1. Test OrganizationConsider grouping the custom value type tests in a separate nested class: public class CustomValueTypeTests
{
public struct CustomValueType { ... }
// All CustomValueType tests here
}2. Edge Case AdditionConsider adding a test for enum with explicit underlying values: public enum MyExplicitEnum : byte
{
First = 10,
Second = 20
}3. Documentation EnhancementThe priority fix comments could be even clearer: /// Priority -1: Lower than generic fallback; only used when TActual != TExpected for cross-type IEquatable scenarios.🎯 Compliance with Repository Guidelines✅ Dual-mode compatibility: Not applicable (test-only changes) 🏆 ConclusionThis is a high-quality PR that significantly improves test coverage while fixing a subtle but important method resolution issue. The changes are well-tested, follow repository conventions, and include proper documentation updates. Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE The comprehensive test coverage and priority fix demonstrate attention to detail and understanding of the codebase's assertion framework design. |
Fixes #3387