Skip to content

Conversation

@neilcampbell
Copy link

The operation passed into Execute/ExecuteWithRetries seems to be invoked 1 additional time than the configured circuit breaker threshold before going into the open circuit state. I don't think this is the desired behavior.

This PR should fix it.
The tests will also log some info to the console to help give context.

Neil Campbell added 2 commits August 25, 2014 13:06
…al time than the configured circuit breaker threshold before going into the open circuit state.
@tathamoddie
Copy link
Owner

Howdy. Looks good at a glance. Hold up is that I need to get a proper build and release process going for this repo. (It’s pretty old.) Will try and get to that soon.

From: Neil Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2014 23:45
To: tathamoddie/reliability-patterns
Subject: [reliability-patterns] Fixing what looks to be a small bug (#2)

The operation passed into Execute/ExecuteWithRetries seems to be invoked 1 additional time than the configured circuit breaker threshold before going into the open circuit state. I don't think this is the desired behavior.

This PR should fix it.
The tests will also log some info to the console to help give context.


You can merge this Pull Request by running

git pull https://github.com/neilcampbell/reliability-patterns master

Or view, comment on, or merge it at:

#2

Commit Summary

  • Removing hgignore and adding gitignore
  • Fixing what looks to be a bug, where the action is invoked 1 additional time than the configured circuit breaker threshold before going into the open circuit state.

File Changes

Patch Links:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/2.

@neilcampbell
Copy link
Author

No problems!

@neilcampbell
Copy link
Author

@tathamoddie How are you going with the release stuff?

@neilcampbell
Copy link
Author

@tathamoddie Any progress on this one?

@guibranco
Copy link

@tathamoddie any chance to merge this PR ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants