-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[concurrency] Fix a few issues around not emitted correct protocol witness and vtable thunks for nonisolated(nonsending) #81542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gottesmm
merged 8 commits into
swiftlang:main
from
gottesmm:rdar150209093_rdar151394209
May 19, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
71adae4
[gardening] Cleanup SILDefaultWitnessTable before I change it.
gottesmm e25c664
[sil] Change SILDefaultWitnessTable verification to use verificationE…
gottesmm 634435d
[gardening] Clean up SILWitnessTable::verify before I touch it.
gottesmm ed1654c
[sil] Verify that witness table witnesses are ABI compatible with the…
gottesmm 20d7a6c
[sil] Update tests for witness table ABI verification.
gottesmm ff1cbea
[silgen] Begin placing isolation on protocol witness thunks.
gottesmm 39a013f
[silgen] Place the correct isolation on protocol witness thunks.
gottesmm ef23f97
[silgen] Teach SILGen how to handle nonisolated(nonsending) thunking …
gottesmm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is a generic global actor, does we need to do any kind of substitution to put it in the right generic signature?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gottesmm Do we need to do the generic substitution here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you elaborate on what is the concern here and give me a more complete explanation on what type of test case would generate the problem/why? I am missing a little bit of context.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ActorIsolation
can store a type if the function is isolated to a global actor. If the global actor is generic, then that type might includes references to type parameters. The concern is that this code might be implicitly moving the type between generic signatures without rewriting the type parameters — e.g. taking a type expressed in terms of the type parameters of the protocol requirement and using it in a context that's generic in the same way as the witness.