-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Register TcpSenders on delegated TcpConnection with interceptor instance #3514
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1c9d550
GH-3509: Register TcpSenders on wrapped connection
gigermocas 121e243
Merge branch 'master' into GH-3509
gigermocas e662632
Register TcpSenders on delegated TcpConnection with interceptor instance
gigermocas e9f56c7
use Assert.isInstanceOf() in TcpSendingMessageHandlerTests.testInterc…
gigermocas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is indeed confusing that interceptor abstraction implements a connection one.
So, we have such a strange code flow...
I wish @garyrussell will come back to us one day to revise this architecture 😄
Nevertheless would you mind, @gigermocas , to double check what we have so far with the
TcpConnectionSupport.close()
:After this fix it doesn't look like we are going to clean up properly...
I'll debug it locally meanwhile, too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is a bit of a mess; dates back to very early code and has caused headaches since then.
Maybe in 6.0 @artembilan if you want to raise an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue created: #3515, but it doesn't mean we have to make it in
6.0
. Probably one day in the future when it causes more headaches 😉There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ouch, I was too slow writing this, but these were my observations.
TcpConnectionSupport.close()
can be called multiple times andTcpConnectionInterceptorSupport.close()
will ultimately call it too.TcpConnectionSupport.closeConnection()
(throughclose()
) can call both again.TcpConnectionSupport.close()
with also publish a close event, which must be done once.Keeping the senders list in TcpConnectionSupport seemed like a better fit looking at the rest of the API (and parity with the other register methods)
I hoped it was cleaner, I don't particularly like it, but I couldn't find an alternative without worrying about breaking the API or polluting the interceptor by re-implementing some behavior from
TcpConnectionSupport
😟