Skip to content

Conversation

@artembilan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

image: rabbitmq
image: rabbitmq:management
ports:
- 5672:5672
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we need to map the management port (15762)?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just copy/paste all of this stuff blindly 😄
Is that just enough to have another entry like - 15762:15762 ?
Do we have some tests for that to be sure that they run properly?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm - now I don't know how the previous PR builds were good; for example RabbitAdminIntegrationTests has @RabbitAvailable(management = true)

But we have other tests (e.g. EnableRabbitIntegrationTests) that don't check for the management plugin is available, but require it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh; it has a try/catch

	@Test
	public void deadLetterOnDefaultExchange() {
		this.rabbitTemplate.convertAndSend("amqp656", "foo");
		assertThat(this.rabbitTemplate.receiveAndConvert("amqp656dlq", 10000)).isEqualTo("foo");
		try {
			Client rabbitRestClient = new Client("http://localhost:15672/api/", "guest", "guest");
			QueueInfo amqp656 = rabbitRestClient.getQueue("/", "amqp656");
			if (amqp656 != null) {
				assertThat(amqp656.getArguments().get("test-empty")).isEqualTo("");
				assertThat(amqp656.getArguments().get("test-null")).isEqualTo("undefined");
			}
		}
		catch (Exception e) {
			// empty
		}
	}

@garyrussell garyrussell merged commit 6c7ac67 into spring-projects:master Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants