Refactor client Call Fabric E2E tests - Pass 1 #1305

LittorWired · 2025-09-05T08:59:01Z

Description

• Replaced page.evaluate() with expectPageEvalToPass- Added proper assertion functions and descriptive messages for better debugging

• Split operations into granular test.step() calls - Separated event listeners from operations for easier test failure tracing

• Fixed polling logic bug in utils - Corrected interval vs timeout behavior to prevent unnecessary polling

Added additional unit tests for the utils.spec.ts to ensure expected behavior and avoid future regressions

Test Files Changed

internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/address.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/agent_customer.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/audioFlags.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/cleanup.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/conversation.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/deviceEvent.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/deviceState.spec.ts
internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/utils.spec.ts

Will continue the refactoring of the remaining CF e2e tests in future PR.

Type of change

Internal refactoring
Bug fix (bugfix - non-breaking)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Code snippets

In case of new feature or breaking changes, please include code snippets.

…oPass

… tests

…w inferred return type

…alToPass

changeset-bot · 2025-09-05T08:59:04Z

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7255603

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

claude · 2025-09-05T08:59:16Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

…ectPageEvalToPass for event assertions

claude · 2025-09-05T14:38:57Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

claude · 2025-09-05T14:39:29Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

…eEvalToPass for assertions

claude · 2025-09-08T14:28:38Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

…ertions

claude · 2025-09-08T15:07:04Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

claude · 2025-09-08T15:49:52Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

claude · 2025-09-09T13:09:29Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

claude · 2025-09-09T13:32:29Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this WIP PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

jpsantosbh · 2025-09-16T21:15:17Z

internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/audioFlags.spec.ts

+          })
+
+          window._callObj = call
+          return true


Suggested change

return true

return isCallSession(call)

@jpsantosbh this can be done if the data is serializable. let me double check if that works

actually what I will do to ensure it works is what we previously discussed.... using a util to check if the data is serializable to avoid introducing errors in the test

Ok, so promises for example will fail

I tried to implement the serializable check but it is not straightforward so I reverted the changes I introduced in this PR for that check. The check needs to occur within the page.evaluate() browser context call and cannot of course be passed in as a callback because of the way Playwright's APIs for page.evaluate work.

I had one potential solution which was potentially using new Function constructor to recreate a function signature but it seems like a bad approach.

jpsantosbh · 2025-09-16T21:16:08Z

internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/audioFlags.spec.ts

+          }

-              call.on('call.joined', resolve)
+          const call = client.reattach({


Suggested change

const call = client.reattach({

const call = await client.reattach({

jpsantosbh · 2025-09-16T21:16:30Z

internal/e2e-client/tests/callfabric/audioFlags.spec.ts

-          { roomName }
-        )
+          window._callObj = call
+          return true


Suggested change

return true

return isCallSesion(call)

@jpsantosbh unfortunately, this doesn't work because it is a utility called inside the page.evaluate()

🤔 Ok...
So we can't call other utility functions inside expectPageEvalToPass.
Would !(call instanceof Promise) work? The thing we should avoid is returning a constant true, IMO.

@jpsantosbh yeah the ability to execute any callback is a "limitation" of the Playwright API

I tried returning the call object but it returns undefined from the page.evaluate() because it's not serializable

I think !(call instanceof Promise) should work. Let me try that

@jpsantosbh I've returned the call.id and written assertions for that

jpsantosbh

needs this small changes

Co-authored-by: João Paulo Barbosa Marques dos Santos <[email protected]>

claude · 2025-09-18T12:55:48Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring with Important Test Stability Concerns

This PR represents a significant improvement to the E2E test suite with a well-designed refactoring approach. However, there's a critical concern about increased test failures that needs to be addressed before merging.

🚨 Critical Test Stability Issue

Key Concern from @jpsantosbh: This branch shows more test failures than main, despite main having known issues with not catching errors like the start() promise. The increased failures may be legitimate issues now being caught due to better error handling.

Recommendation: Hold the merge until the root cause of increased failures is identified and resolved. The improved error catching is good, but we need to ensure the underlying issues are fixed rather than just detected.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

New expectPageEvalToPass Utility: Excellent abstraction that provides:
- Consistent 10-second timeout behavior across all tests
- Clear assertion messages for better debugging
- Type-safe evaluation with proper error handling
- Reduced boilerplate code significantly
Improved Test Structure:
- Better separation of concerns with explicit test.step() calls
- Event listeners set up before operations (audioFlags.spec.ts:47-78)
- More granular and descriptive test steps
Enhanced Error Handling: Tests now properly catch and surface errors that were previously hidden

Code Quality Improvements:

// Before: Direct page.evaluate() with basic error handling
const result = await page.evaluate(async () => {
  // Complex logic with potential silent failures
})

// After: Structured expectation with clear assertions
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: async () => {
    // Same logic but with proper error propagation
  },
  assertionFn: (result) => {
    expect(result, 'descriptive message').toBeDefined()
  },
  message: 'expect specific operation to succeed',
})

🐛 Issues Found Requiring Fixes

High Priority - From Review Comments:

audioFlags.spec.ts:208: Missing await keyword before client.reattach() call
```
// Should be:
const call = await client.reattach({
```
audioFlags.spec.ts:702: Return statement should check for proper call type
```
// Should be:  
return isCallSession(call)
```
audioFlags.spec.ts:214: Typo in function name
```
// Should be:
return isCallSession(call)
```

Medium Priority:
4. utils.ts:1919-1925: The expectToPass function sets both intervals and timeout to 10 seconds by default. This eliminates polling behavior, which may mask timing issues in tests.

Test Failure Pattern: The increased failures may indicate:
- Real race conditions now being detected
- Timeout values that are too aggressive
- Network/infrastructure issues now being caught

Low Priority:
6. address.spec.ts:214: Commented skip test should be either removed or converted to proper skip
7. Multiple TODO comments: Several unused functions marked for removal (createTestVRTToken, createTestJWTToken, etc.)

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Consistent Timeout Strategy: All tests now use 10-second timeouts, reducing flakiness
Better Resource Cleanup: More predictable cleanup patterns with structured teardown
Reduced Test Noise: Better assertion messages reduce debugging time

Potential Concerns:

Fixed 10s Intervals: May be too long for fast operations, too short for complex ones
No Polling: The interval=timeout approach means operations either succeed immediately or timeout

🔒 Security Review

No Security Concerns ✅

Token handling remains secure
No credential exposure in test code
Proper authentication patterns maintained

🧪 Test Coverage & Reliability Analysis

Excellent Coverage Improvements:

New Utils Tests: utils.spec.ts provides comprehensive coverage of the utility functions
Better Event Testing: Audio flags test properly waits for all related events
More Robust Assertions: Each operation now has explicit success criteria

Test Files Refactored (8 total):

address.spec.ts - Address querying improvements
agent_customer.spec.ts - Agent-customer interaction stability
audioFlags.spec.ts - Audio flag management with proper event handling
cleanup.spec.ts - Resource cleanup verification
conversation.spec.ts - Conversation functionality
deviceEvent.spec.ts - Device event handling
deviceState.spec.ts - Device state management
utils.spec.ts - New comprehensive utility tests

💡 Key Improvements

expectPageEvalToPass Pattern:

// Provides consistent error handling, timeouts, and debugging
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => /* operation */,
  assertionFn: (result) => expect(result).toBeDefined(),
  message: 'clear description of what should happen'
})

Structured Test Steps: Better organization and failure isolation
Enhanced Error Messages: Much clearer debugging information
Type Safety: Improved TypeScript usage throughout

⚠️ Recommendations

Before Merging:

Fix the 4 issues identified above (missing await, typos, return statements)
Investigate Test Failures: Analyze why this branch has more failures than main
Consider Timeout Strategy: Review if 10s is appropriate for all operations

Future Improvements:

Dynamic Timeout Configuration: Allow per-test timeout customization
Polling Strategy: Consider bringing back polling for operations that need it
Performance Metrics: Track test execution time improvements

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
❓ CI Stability: Needs investigation due to increased failures

🎯 Verdict

Changes Requested - The refactoring is excellent and significantly improves code quality, but the following must be addressed before merging:

Fix the 4 technical issues identified (await keywords, typos, return statements)
Investigate and fix the root cause of increased test failures mentioned by @jpsantosbh

After These Issues Are Resolved: This will be an excellent improvement to the test suite that should be merged and used as a pattern for future test refactoring.

…in e2e playwright tests

claude · 2025-09-22T11:35:04Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring with Important Test Stability Concerns

This PR represents a significant improvement to the E2E test suite with a well-designed refactoring approach. However, there's a critical concern about increased test failures that needs to be addressed before merging.

🚨 Critical Test Stability Issue

Key Concern from @jpsantosbh: This branch shows more test failures than main, despite main having known issues with not catching errors like the start() promise. The increased failures may be legitimate issues now being caught due to better error handling.

Recommendation: Hold the merge until the root cause of increased failures is identified and resolved. The improved error catching is good, but we need to ensure the underlying issues are fixed rather than just detected.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

New expectPageEvalToPass Utility: Excellent abstraction that provides:
- Consistent 10-second timeout behavior across all tests
- Clear assertion messages for better debugging
- Type-safe evaluation with proper error handling
- Reduced boilerplate code significantly
Improved Test Structure:
- Better separation of concerns with explicit test.step() calls
- Event listeners set up before operations (audioFlags.spec.ts:47-78)
- More granular and descriptive test steps
Enhanced Error Handling: Tests now properly catch and surface errors that were previously hidden

Code Quality Improvements:

// Before: Direct page.evaluate() with basic error handling
const result = await page.evaluate(async () => {
  // Complex logic with potential silent failures
})

// After: Structured expectation with clear assertions
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: async () => {
    // Same logic but with proper error propagation
  },
  assertionFn: (result) => {
    expect(result, 'descriptive message').toBeDefined()
  },
  message: 'expect specific operation to succeed',
})

🐛 Issues Found Requiring Fixes

High Priority - From Review Comments:

audioFlags.spec.ts:208: Missing await keyword before client.reattach() call
```
// Should be:
const call = await client.reattach({
```
audioFlags.spec.ts:702: Return statement should check for proper call type
```
// Should be:  
return isCallSession(call)
```
audioFlags.spec.ts:214: Typo in function name
```
// Should be:
return isCallSession(call)
```

Medium Priority:
4. utils.ts:1919-1925: The expectToPass function sets both intervals and timeout to 10 seconds by default. This eliminates polling behavior, which may mask timing issues in tests.

Test Failure Pattern: The increased failures may indicate:
- Real race conditions now being detected
- Timeout values that are too aggressive
- Network/infrastructure issues now being caught

Low Priority:
6. address.spec.ts:214: Commented skip test should be either removed or converted to proper skip
7. Multiple TODO comments: Several unused functions marked for removal (createTestVRTToken, createTestJWTToken, etc.)

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Consistent Timeout Strategy: All tests now use 10-second timeouts, reducing flakiness
Better Resource Cleanup: More predictable cleanup patterns with structured teardown
Reduced Test Noise: Better assertion messages reduce debugging time

Potential Concerns:

Fixed 10s Intervals: May be too long for fast operations, too short for complex ones
No Polling: The interval=timeout approach means operations either succeed immediately or timeout

🔒 Security Review

No Security Concerns ✅

Token handling remains secure
No credential exposure in test code
Proper authentication patterns maintained

🧪 Test Coverage & Reliability Analysis

Excellent Coverage Improvements:

New Utils Tests: utils.spec.ts provides comprehensive coverage of the utility functions
Better Event Testing: Audio flags test properly waits for all related events
More Robust Assertions: Each operation now has explicit success criteria

Test Files Refactored (8 total):

address.spec.ts - Address querying improvements
agent_customer.spec.ts - Agent-customer interaction stability
audioFlags.spec.ts - Audio flag management with proper event handling
cleanup.spec.ts - Resource cleanup verification
conversation.spec.ts - Conversation functionality
deviceEvent.spec.ts - Device event handling
deviceState.spec.ts - Device state management
utils.spec.ts - New comprehensive utility tests

💡 Key Improvements

expectPageEvalToPass Pattern:

// Provides consistent error handling, timeouts, and debugging
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => /* operation */,
  assertionFn: (result) => expect(result).toBeDefined(),
  message: 'clear description of what should happen'
})

Structured Test Steps: Better organization and failure isolation
Enhanced Error Messages: Much clearer debugging information
Type Safety: Improved TypeScript usage throughout

⚠️ Recommendations

Before Merging:

Fix the 4 issues identified above (missing await, typos, return statements)
Investigate Test Failures: Analyze why this branch has more failures than main
Consider Timeout Strategy: Review if 10s is appropriate for all operations

Future Improvements:

Dynamic Timeout Configuration: Allow per-test timeout customization
Polling Strategy: Consider bringing back polling for operations that need it
Performance Metrics: Track test execution time improvements

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
❓ CI Stability: Needs investigation due to increased failures

🎯 Verdict

Changes Requested - The refactoring is excellent and significantly improves code quality, but the following must be addressed before merging:

Fix the 4 technical issues identified (await keywords, typos, return statements)
Investigate and fix the root cause of increased test failures mentioned by @jpsantosbh

After These Issues Are Resolved: This will be an excellent improvement to the test suite that should be merged and used as a pattern for future test refactoring.

…ance

claude · 2025-09-22T12:32:32Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

claude · 2025-09-22T13:56:32Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

LittorWired · 2025-09-22T14:31:18Z

@jpsantosbh I've made the suggested changes where possible. Some of the changes I had to revert because they were causing errors.

E2E tests are passing expect for the swml TTS audio test on staging

jpsantosbh

Looks good!

The only 2 test failing are failing due test race conditions we need to fix, but not in this PR. If there a way the replace the return true for any real boolean check I think that would be better.

claude · 2025-09-22T15:11:09Z

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this PR for E2E client Call Fabric test refactoring:

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

This PR represents a high-quality refactoring that significantly improves the E2E test suite. The new expectPageEvalToPass utility pattern is well-designed and addresses several important concerns.

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

Consistent Error Handling: All tests now have uniform timeout and retry behavior (10s default)
Better Test Isolation: Each test step is clearly separated with explicit assertions
Improved Readability: The refactored tests are much more readable with clear intent
Type Safety: Good TypeScript usage with proper type annotations and generic parameters
DRY Principle: Eliminates substantial code duplication across test files

Minor Suggestions:

utils.ts:399-460: Consider extracting the SignalWire client creation logic into a smaller, more focused function
Type Consistency: The extraEvents parameter type change in expectCFFinalEvents from Promise<unknown>[] to Promise<boolean>[] is good but could be documented in a comment

🐛 Potential Issues Found

Low Priority:

address.spec.ts:214: The commented skip test for DESC sorting should either be removed or converted to a proper skip with a GitHub issue reference
Timeout Configuration: All tests use 10s timeout - consider if some operations might need longer timeouts (e.g., complex room operations)

No Critical Issues Found ✅

⚡ Performance Considerations

Improvements:

Reduced Test Flakiness: Consistent timeout/retry behavior should reduce CI flakiness
Better Resource Management: Tests now have more predictable cleanup patterns
Parallel Event Handling: Audio flags test properly sets up multiple event listeners before triggering changes

Observations:

The 10-second interval for polling is appropriate for E2E tests to avoid excessive resource usage
No performance regressions identified

🔒 Security Review

Clean - No Security Concerns ✅

No sensitive data exposure
Proper token handling maintained
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Guest client creation follows secure patterns

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

Excellent Coverage Maintenance:

All existing test scenarios preserved
Enhanced assertion coverage with the new utility
Better error reporting for debugging failures
Proper event lifecycle testing (setup → trigger → verify)

Notable Improvements:

Audio Flags Test: Now properly waits for all related events before proceeding
Address Tests: More robust with explicit assertion functions
Agent/Customer Tests: Better separation of concerns with clear test steps

🏆 Recommendations

Documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to expectPageEvalToPass explaining common usage patterns
Test Organization: The refactor makes tests much more maintainable - consider this pattern for other test suites
Error Messages: The custom messages in expectPageEvalToPass are excellent for debugging - maintain this practice
Code Consistency: Apply this pattern to remaining E2E tests for consistency

📊 Impact Assessment

✅ Maintainability: Significantly improved
✅ Reliability: Better error handling and timeouts
✅ Readability: Much clearer test intent
✅ Debugging: Better error messages and stack traces
✅ CI Stability: Should reduce test flakiness

🎯 Verdict

Approve with Minor Suggestions - This is excellent refactoring work that substantially improves the test suite. The expectPageEvalToPass utility is well-designed and consistently applied. No blocking issues found.

Ready for merge once the minor suggestions are addressed (optional) and any final reviews are complete.

jpsantosbh · 2025-09-25T23:26:57Z

@LittorWired I needed to merge this

LittorWired · 2025-09-26T11:28:40Z

@jpsantosbh no problem. I am still trying to finish up the comments on #1312

LittorWired added 9 commits September 4, 2025 18:59

fix waitForFunction bugs with parameters being incorrect

2428fc3

in expectToPass use the correct intervals param to fix polling issues

4875112

add polling unit tests for the utils expectToPass and expectPageEvalT…

766444a

…oPass

implement the unit tests for the waitForFunction utility with polling…

591ab3c

… tests

refactor address.spec.ts tests to use the expectPageEvalToPass utility

1835909

refactor expectCFFinalEvents to utilize expectPageEvalToPass and allo…

09fec22

…w inferred return type

fix type linting issues

12663d0

refactor agent_customer.spec.ts tests to utilize expectPageEvalToPass

b556e92

refactor the first test in audioFlags.spec.ts to utilize expectPageEv…

7f33331

…alToPass

refactor audioFlags.spec.ts to improve test structure and utilize exp…

b429a13

…ectPageEvalToPass for event assertions

remove unused type

4e1856c

refactor cleanup.spec.ts to improve test structure, utilize expectPag…

d0a1b86

…eEvalToPass for assertions

refactor conversation.spec.ts to utilize expectPageEvalToPass for ass…

53bdd00

…ertions

refactor deviceEvent.spec.ts to utilize expectPageEvalToPass

c51cd3c

fix util tests after fixing intervals param

e29bc0e

refactor deviceState.spec.ts to utilize expectPageEvalToPass

42ee800

LittorWired self-assigned this Sep 9, 2025

LittorWired requested review from RafaelPChequer, iAmmar7 and jpsantosbh September 9, 2025 13:50

LittorWired changed the title ~~WIP: Refactor client Call Fabric E2E tests~~ Refactor client Call Fabric E2E tests - Pass 1 Sep 9, 2025

jpsantosbh reviewed Sep 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

jpsantosbh requested changes Sep 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

PR feedback: await client.rettach call

6f778c3

Co-authored-by: João Paulo Barbosa Marques dos Santos <[email protected]>

LittorWired added 6 commits September 18, 2025 21:53

Add isSerializable utility function to check for serializable values …

2045e01

…in e2e playwright tests

tests for isSerializable utility function for e2e tests

7d35c31

add serialization check to expectPageEvalToPass

f60f4ca

fix bug on argument check for expectPageEvalToPass

1866875

revert the serializable checks

0a76e14

revert the serializable checks

8d1d355

PR feedback: address PR feedback on call.reattach and check call inst…

2bcb78a

…ance

revert the isCallSession checks as they fail

4f7a37c

jpsantosbh previously approved these changes Sep 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

PR feedback: assertions against the callSession.id

7255603

LittorWired dismissed jpsantosbh’s stale review via 7255603 September 22, 2025 15:10

LittorWired requested a review from jpsantosbh September 22, 2025 15:54

iAmmar7 approved these changes Sep 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

jpsantosbh approved these changes Sep 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

RafaelPChequer approved these changes Sep 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

jpsantosbh merged commit db71c71 into main Sep 25, 2025
35 of 36 checks passed

jpsantosbh deleted the tl/cp-15995-refactor-e2e-client-tests-new-util-pattern branch September 25, 2025 23:27

	const call = client.reattach({
	const call = await client.reattach({

Refactor client Call Fabric E2E tests - Pass 1 #1305

Refactor client Call Fabric E2E tests - Pass 1 #1305

Uh oh!

Conversation

LittorWired commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Test Files Changed

Type of change

Code snippets

Uh oh!

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ No Changeset found

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Progress

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

🐛 Potential Issues Found

⚡ Performance Considerations

🔒 Security Review

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

🏆 Recommendations

📊 Impact Assessment

🎯 Verdict

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Progress

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

🐛 Potential Issues Found

⚡ Performance Considerations

🔒 Security Review

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

🏆 Recommendations

📊 Impact Assessment

🎯 Verdict

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Progress

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

🐛 Potential Issues Found

⚡ Performance Considerations

🔒 Security Review

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

🏆 Recommendations

📊 Impact Assessment

🎯 Verdict

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 8, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Progress

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

✅ Excellent Refactoring - Strong Improvements

🔧 Code Quality & Best Practices

🐛 Potential Issues Found

⚡ Performance Considerations

🔒 Security Review

🧪 Test Coverage Analysis

🏆 Recommendations

📊 Impact Assessment

🎯 Verdict

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 8, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Progress

Todo List:

Code Review Feedback

LittorWired commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading