fix: reprs had missing information

[amangoel185]

Fixes #200

[henryiii]

Could you add a test for the repr to make this doesn't happen again?

[amangoel185]

Sure, I'll do that.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 2.66%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.62 ⭐	0.44 ⭐	-0.18 👍
Method Length	30.38 ⭐	36.48 ⭐	6.10 👎
Working memory	7.04 🙂	7.58 🙂	0.54 👎
Quality	85.63% ⭐	82.97% ⭐	-2.66% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	232	268	36

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/hist/axis/init.py	83.98% ⭐	83.98% ⭐	0.00%
tests/test_reprs.py	88.86% ⭐	82.10% ⭐	-6.76% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/hist/axis/init.py	Regular.__init__	2 ⭐	71 🙂	17 ⛔	61.22% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
src/hist/axis/init.py	Integer.__init__	2 ⭐	65 🙂	15 😞	64.25% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
src/hist/axis/init.py	Variable.__init__	2 ⭐	63 🙂	14 😞	65.82% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_reprs.py	test_ND_empty_repr	0 ⭐	80 🙂	12 😞	68.22% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[amangoel185]

I've added the tests, @henryiii. You can merge it if it looks good to you.

[henryiii]

Not sure why these got reordered, but due to the "*" above, order does not affect users, so it's safe. :)

[amangoel185]

Oh, I reordered them since I saw that order in Regular.