Make coverage more similar to the one in Scala 2 #23722
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #21877
throw
contentsa+b+c
we do not redundantly taga+b
)After all of these changes the statements tagged are much more similar to Scala 2, let's look at the #21877 minimisation:
There are some differences still remaining, most notably the tagging the DefDefs and its default parameters, but I left them for now, as those seem more useful than harmful.
BEcouse of those changed most of the .covergae files had to be regenerated, however I want through each and every diff to make sure that all of those changes there are expected.
Additionally, this PR also fixes #21695 (issue with certain generated Block nodes not having assigned the correct type, causing later undefined errors).