Skip to content

Conversation

@saurabharch
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073
  436  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @saurabharch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the project's security posture by upgrading the firebase dependency. The primary goal is to remediate a known Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability by moving to a significantly newer major version of the library.

Highlights

  • Security Fix: This pull request addresses a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073) by upgrading the firebase dependency.
  • Dependency Upgrade: The firebase package has been upgraded from version 4.11.0 to 7.14.0.
  • Automated Creation: This pull request was automatically generated by Snyk to propose the security fix.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to resolve a security vulnerability by upgrading the firebase package. However, the proposed upgrade from version 4.11.0 to 7.14.0 is a major version change that introduces breaking changes incompatible with the version of angularfire2 used in this project. This will almost certainly break the application. A more comprehensive upgrade of multiple packages, including Angular itself, is required to support this new version of Firebase.

"bootstrap": "4.0.0-beta.2",
"core-js": "^2.4.1",
"firebase": "^4.11.0",
"firebase": "^7.14.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This automated upgrade of firebase from v4.11.0 to v7.14.0 is a major version jump that will break the application due to incompatibilities with other dependencies.

Problem Details:

  • Dependency Incompatibility: The project uses angularfire2@^5.0.0-rc.6. This version of angularfire2 has a peer dependency on firebase@^4.5.0 and is not compatible with [email protected].
  • Breaking API Changes: Firebase introduced numerous breaking changes between versions 4 and 7. The existing codebase, which relies on the [email protected] API via angularfire2, will fail to compile or run with [email protected].

Required Action:

To successfully upgrade firebase, a larger migration is necessary. This would involve:

  1. Upgrading angularfire2 to its successor, @angular/fire.
  2. Upgrading the Angular framework itself from version 5 to a more recent version compatible with the new @angular/fire.

Given the complexity, I recommend rejecting this automated pull request. A planned, manual upgrade of the entire front-end stack should be undertaken instead to address the security vulnerability and keep the project up-to-date.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants