- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 13.9k
 
          Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when proc_macro bridge is changed
          #99183
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | 
          
 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)  | 
    
              
                    lnicola
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Jul 12, 2022 
                  
              
              
            
            
              
                    Veykril
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Jul 12, 2022 
                  
              
              
            
            
| 
           @bors r+ rollup btw, are we planning to keep the team name "wg-rls-2" indefinitely? I would expect it to change to wg-rls or wg-rust-analyzer at some point.  | 
    
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 13, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…r-a, r=jyn514 Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed rust-analyzer vendors a modified copy of the `proc_macro` crate in order to expand procedural macros built by Cargo. Since the ABI used by proc macros can change, we need to follow along with those changes. Getting notified when the proc macro bridge changes should make that easier, since that's what defines the ABI. cc ``@rust-lang/wg-rls-2``
    
  Dylan-DPC 
      added a commit
        to Dylan-DPC/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 13, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…r-a, r=jyn514 Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed rust-analyzer vendors a modified copy of the `proc_macro` crate in order to expand procedural macros built by Cargo. Since the ABI used by proc macros can change, we need to follow along with those changes. Getting notified when the proc macro bridge changes should make that easier, since that's what defines the ABI. cc ````@rust-lang/wg-rls-2````
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 13, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…laumeGomez Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98789 (rustdoc-json-types: Clean up derives.) - rust-lang#98848 (Build the Clippy book as part of x.py doc) - rust-lang#99020 (check non_exhaustive attr and private fields for transparent types) - rust-lang#99132 (Add some autolabels for A-bootstrap and T-infra) - rust-lang#99148 (Clarify that [iu]size bounds were only defined for the target arch) - rust-lang#99152 (Use CSS variables to handle theming (part 2)) - rust-lang#99168 (Add regression test for rust-lang#74713) - rust-lang#99176 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#99183 (Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed) - rust-lang#99185 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Sep 5, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…mention-r-a, r=Mark-Simulacrum Revert "Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed" Reverts rust-lang#99183 rust-analyzer is now a subtree, and CI fails when the `proc_macro` bridge changes break our tests, so these notifications aren't needed anymore.
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Sep 5, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…mention-r-a, r=Mark-Simulacrum Revert "Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed" Reverts rust-lang#99183 rust-analyzer is now a subtree, and CI fails when the `proc_macro` bridge changes break our tests, so these notifications aren't needed anymore.
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Sep 5, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…mention-r-a, r=Mark-Simulacrum Revert "Mention rust-analyzer maintainers when `proc_macro` bridge is changed" Reverts rust-lang#99183 rust-analyzer is now a subtree, and CI fails when the `proc_macro` bridge changes break our tests, so these notifications aren't needed anymore.
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    A-meta
  Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself 
  
    A-proc-macros
  Area: Procedural macros 
  
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
rust-analyzer vendors a modified copy of the
proc_macrocrate in order to expand procedural macros built by Cargo. Since the ABI used by proc macros can change, we need to follow along with those changes. Getting notified when the proc macro bridge changes should make that easier, since that's what defines the ABI.cc @rust-lang/wg-rls-2