Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented May 28, 2022

I just realized I forgot to update these docs when adding from_exposed_addr.
Right now the docs say invalid and from_exposed_addr are both equivalent to a cast, and that is clearly not what we want (and is also not the case any more in terms of implementation since #97219).

Cc @Gankra

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 28, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 28, 2022
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented May 28, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 28, 2022

📌 Commit 852777e has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 28, 2022
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 28, 2022
ptr::invalid is not equivalent to a int2ptr cast

I just realized I forgot to update these docs when adding `from_exposed_addr`.
Right now the docs say `invalid` and `from_exposed_addr` are both equivalent to a cast, and that is clearly not what we want.

Cc `@Gankra`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 29, 2022
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96950 (Add regression test for rust-lang#96395)
 - rust-lang#97028 (Add support for embedding pretty printers via `#[debugger_visualizer]` attribute)
 - rust-lang#97478 (Remove FIXME on `ExtCtxt::fn_decl()`)
 - rust-lang#97479 (Make some tests check-pass)
 - rust-lang#97482 (ptr::invalid is not equivalent to a int2ptr cast)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 774d7ce into rust-lang:master May 29, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 29, 2022
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the ptr-invalid branch May 29, 2022 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants