Skip to content

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

Avoids #96194
Alternative to #96970

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 14, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 14, 2022
@aliemjay
Copy link
Member

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 14, 2022

@aliemjay: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 14, 2022

⌛ Trying commit b276b65 with merge 964cb6ab31b62c60eb4b2fdc021a166f0b6076d4...

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

This seems much nicer than #96970.

Crater run for this can happen in parallel, but let's get this in for the release train.

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 14, 2022

📌 Commit 872f09c has been approved by jackh726

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 14, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 14, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 872f09c with merge b36be12...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 14, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing b36be12 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 14, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 14, 2022
Forbid nested opaque types to reference HRTB from opaque types.

Backport version of rust-lang#97039 if useful.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
@bors bors merged commit b36be12 into rust-lang:master May 14, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 14, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b36be12): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Backported to beta via #97040.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants