Skip to content

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Nov 24, 2021

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option -C overflow-checks.
The goal was to delete the -Z flag once users had migrated 1.
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip 2.

r? @wesleywiser
cc @RalfJung

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C
overflow-checks`. The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had
migrated [1]. Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete
the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224
@camelid camelid added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 24, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 24, 2021
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @camelid!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 24, 2021

📌 Commit f0b990a has been approved by wesleywiser

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 24, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…=wesleywiser

Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C overflow-checks`.
The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had migrated [1].
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224

r? `@wesleywiser`
cc `@RalfJung`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…=wesleywiser

Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C overflow-checks`.
The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had migrated [1].
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224

r? ``@wesleywiser``
cc ``@RalfJung``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89359 (Various fixes for const_trait_impl)
 - rust-lang#90499 (Link with default MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET if not otherwise specified.)
 - rust-lang#91096 (Print associated types on opaque `impl Trait` types)
 - rust-lang#91111 (Do not visit attributes in `ItemLowerer`.)
 - rust-lang#91162 (explain why CTFE/Miri perform truncation on shift offset)
 - rust-lang#91185 (Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 984e644 into rust-lang:master Nov 25, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 25, 2021
@camelid camelid deleted the rm-force-overflow-checks branch November 25, 2021 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants