Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Followup: #90475 (comment)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 4, 2021
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @camelid

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 4, 2021

r=camelid,GuillaumeGomez with CI passing

@bors rollup=never

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 4, 2021

@bors r=camelid,GuillaumeGomez rollup=never

(rollup=never because this may affect perf)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 4, 2021

📌 Commit 7f26883 has been approved by camelid,GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 4, 2021
@camelid camelid added I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 4, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 7f26883 with merge a6162f6...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: camelid,GuillaumeGomez
Pushing a6162f6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 5, 2021
@bors bors merged commit a6162f6 into rust-lang:master Nov 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 5, 2021
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/doc-fold-stripped-conditional branch November 5, 2021 04:42
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a6162f6): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 5, 2021

Hmm, this change actually caused some minor regressions (~0.05% and ~0.10%).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants