Skip to content

Conversation

@Nitepone
Copy link
Contributor

Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.

Previously, the doc text referred to the "f" parameter as the "default" function; and the "default" parameter as the "fallback" function.

Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @yaahc (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 30, 2021
@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned yaahc Oct 3, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Indeed this was written in a very confusing way before.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Oct 3, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 3, 2021

📌 Commit 35b0015 has been approved by dtolnay

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 3, 2021
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2021
…x, r=dtolnay

Improve wording of `map_or_else` docs

Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.

Previously, the doc text referred to the "f" parameter as the "default" function; and the "default" parameter as the "fallback" function.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2021
…x, r=dtolnay

Improve wording of `map_or_else` docs

Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.

Previously, the doc text referred to the "f" parameter as the "default" function; and the "default" parameter as the "fallback" function.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2021
…ingjubilee

Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#83655 ([aarch64] add target feature outline-atomics)
 - rust-lang#87091 (implement advance_(back_)_by on more iterators)
 - rust-lang#88451 (Fix an ICE caused by type mismatch errors being ignored)
 - rust-lang#88452 (VecDeque: improve performance for From<[T; N]>)
 - rust-lang#89400 (Improve wording of `map_or_else` docs)
 - rust-lang#89407 (Recommend running `cargo clean` in E0514 output)
 - rust-lang#89443 (Include the length in BTree hashes)
 - rust-lang#89444 (rustdoc: use slice::contains instead of open-coding it)
 - rust-lang#89447 (Improve error message for missing angle brackets in `[_]::method`)
 - rust-lang#89453 (Consistently use 'supertrait'.)
 - rust-lang#89483 (Practice diagnostic message convention)
 - rust-lang#89500 (Fix ICE with buffered lint referring to AST node deleted by everybody_loops)
 - rust-lang#89508 (Stabilize `const_panic`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9e387cf into rust-lang:master Oct 4, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 4, 2021
@orlp
Copy link
Contributor

orlp commented Oct 5, 2021

I'm sorry but I feel a bit robbed? I made a pull request a month ago #88772 =/

@Nitepone
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nitepone commented Oct 5, 2021

Geez, sincere apologies on that. I clearly didn't look around much before making this; I should have searched through open PRs and issues.

I was tunnel visioned on the contributing docs as I had not contributed to this project before. This entire PR was made the morning after a rough experience last Wednesday from a doc misunderstanding.

@yaahc
Copy link
Member

yaahc commented Oct 5, 2021

I'm sorry but I feel a bit robbed? I made a pull request a month ago #88772 =/

I'm sorry about that. We split up our reviews across the team and different members have different availability. The end result is most of us are only aware of a subset of active PRs and those PRs get reviewed in fairly random order, so I assure you it wasn't intentional 😅 . If you want to update your PR to add the additional context ontop of this one I'd be happy to review and merge your additions as well.

orlp added a commit to orlp/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants