Skip to content

feature flag: add feature flag type_changing_struct_update for implementation of RFC #2528 #86646

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

feature flag: add feature flag type_changing_struct_update for implementation of RFC #2528 #86646

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
75894b2
add feature flag for `type_changing_struct_update`
kolharsam Jun 26, 2021
609b5e5
remove trailing space in the file
kolharsam Jun 26, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_feature/src/active.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -666,6 +666,10 @@ declare_features! (
/// Allows qualified paths in struct expressions, struct patterns and tuple struct patterns.
(active, more_qualified_paths, "1.54.0", Some(80080), None),

/// Allows creation of instances of a struct by moving fields that have
/// not changed from prior instances of the same struct (RFC #2528)
(active, type_changing_struct_update, "1.55.0", Some(86618), None)
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid Sep 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This just needs a trailing comma to fix CI.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, the version number will need to be updated, right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I believe it should be updated to 1.57.0 (because 1.56.0 is about to be promoted to beta).


// -------------------------------------------------------------------------
// feature-group-end: actual feature gates
// -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expand Down