dbg macro: Discuss use in tests, and slightly clarify #85221
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
|
r? @m-ou-se (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Looks good to me; I particularly appreciate the phrasing of "Debug output from production code is better done with ...", as that makes the intent of |
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
|
I wonder if this will do anything: @bors r? joshtriplett |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit b36a316 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2021
…iplett dbg macro: Discuss use in tests, and slightly clarify As discussed in a tangent in rust-lang#82778. I chose to use [semantic newlines](https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/) in the source text but I don't mind reformatting it.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2021
…iplett dbg macro: Discuss use in tests, and slightly clarify As discussed in a tangent in rust-lang#82778. I chose to use [semantic newlines](https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/) in the source text but I don't mind reformatting it.
This was referenced May 15, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2021
…laumeGomez Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#84461 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary `StripItem` wrapper) - rust-lang#85067 (Minimize amount of fake `DefId`s used in rustdoc) - rust-lang#85207 (Fix typo in comment) - rust-lang#85215 (coverage bug fixes and some refactoring) - rust-lang#85221 (dbg macro: Discuss use in tests, and slightly clarify) - rust-lang#85246 (Miner code formatting) - rust-lang#85253 (swap function order for better read flow) - rust-lang#85256 (Fix display for "implementors" section) - rust-lang#85268 (Use my real name) - rust-lang#85278 (Improve match statements) - rust-lang#85289 (Fix toggle position on mobile) - rust-lang#85323 (Fix eslint errors) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in a tangent in #82778.
I chose to use semantic newlines in the source text but I don't mind reformatting it.