Skip to content

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented May 10, 2021

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 10, 2021
@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented May 10, 2021

r? @jonas-schievink

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 10, 2021

📌 Commit debf987 has been approved by jonas-schievink

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 10, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85050 (Fix suggestions for missing return type lifetime specifiers)
 - rust-lang#85075 (Improve "panic message is not a string literal" warning)
 - rust-lang#85096 (Make unchecked_{add,sub,mul} inherent methods unstably const)
 - rust-lang#85112 (ensure failing promoteds in const/static bodies are handled correctly)
 - rust-lang#85146 (Provide io::Seek::rewind)
 - rust-lang#85147 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e763401 into rust-lang:master May 10, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 10, 2021
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rust-analyzer-2021-05-10 branch May 10, 2021 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants