Skip to content

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Nov 18, 2020

strictly speaking, [u8; usize::MAX] or even [[[u128; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX] are absolutely fine types as long as you don't try to deal with any values of it.

This error message seems to cause some confusion imo, for example in #79135 (comment) so I would prefer us to be more precise here.

See the added test case which uses one of these types without causing an error.

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 18, 2020
@lcnr lcnr force-pushed the lazy-norm-coerce branch 2 times, most recently from 64d2f40 to 73f95cf Compare November 18, 2020 09:57

fn main() {
let _a: Option<<[u16; usize::MAX] as Foo>::Assoc> = None;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs a trailing newline

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Nov 18, 2020

r=me with nit

@bors rollup

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Nov 18, 2020

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 18, 2020

📌 Commit df2aa08b909675e11765a685b83d1aa626e3729e has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 18, 2020
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Nov 18, 2020

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 18, 2020

📌 Commit 88584d5 has been approved by oli-obk

m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2020
type is too big -> values of the type are too big

strictly speaking, `[u8; usize::MAX]` or even `[[[u128; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX]` are absolutely fine types as long as you don't try to deal with any values of it.

This error message seems to cause some confusion imo, for example in rust-lang#79135 (comment) so I would prefer us to be more precise here.

See the added test case which uses one of these types without causing an error.

r? `@oli-obk`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#78361 (Updated the list of white-listed target features for x86)
 - rust-lang#78785 (linux: try to use libc getrandom to allow interposition)
 - rust-lang#78999 (stability: More precise location for deprecation lint on macros)
 - rust-lang#79039 (Tighten the bounds on atomic Ordering in std::sys::unix::weak::Weak)
 - rust-lang#79079 (Turn top-level comments into module docs in MIR visitor)
 - rust-lang#79114 (add trailing_zeros and leading_zeros to non zero types)
 - rust-lang#79131 (Enable AVX512 *epi64 variants by updating stdarch)
 - rust-lang#79133 (bootstrap: use the same version number for rustc and cargo)
 - rust-lang#79145 (Fix handling of panic calls)
 - rust-lang#79151 (Fix typo in `std::io::Write` docs)
 - rust-lang#79158 (type is too big -> values of the type are too big)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 43d13e2 into rust-lang:master Nov 18, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 18, 2020
@lcnr lcnr deleted the lazy-norm-coerce branch November 18, 2020 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants