Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local #74263
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
RalfJung
changed the title
|
This seems good to me, I agree that fast / non-fast is the wrong distinction to draw here, the functionality offered is more important. @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 7dc3886 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors rollup=iffy |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2020
…acrum Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local I was long confused by the `thread_local` and `fast_thread_local` modules in the `sys(_common)` part of libstd. The names make it *sound* like `fast_thread_local` is just a faster version of `thread_local`, but really these are totally different APIs: one provides thread-local "keys", which are non-addressable pointer-sized pieces of local storage with an associated destructor; the other (the "fast" one) provides just a destructor. So I propose we rename `fast_thread_local` to `thread_local_dtor`, and `thread_local` to `thread_local_key`. That's what this PR does.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2020
…acrum Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local I was long confused by the `thread_local` and `fast_thread_local` modules in the `sys(_common)` part of libstd. The names make it *sound* like `fast_thread_local` is just a faster version of `thread_local`, but really these are totally different APIs: one provides thread-local "keys", which are non-addressable pointer-sized pieces of local storage with an associated destructor; the other (the "fast" one) provides just a destructor. So I propose we rename `fast_thread_local` to `thread_local_dtor`, and `thread_local` to `thread_local_key`. That's what this PR does.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2020
…acrum Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local I was long confused by the `thread_local` and `fast_thread_local` modules in the `sys(_common)` part of libstd. The names make it *sound* like `fast_thread_local` is just a faster version of `thread_local`, but really these are totally different APIs: one provides thread-local "keys", which are non-addressable pointer-sized pieces of local storage with an associated destructor; the other (the "fast" one) provides just a destructor. So I propose we rename `fast_thread_local` to `thread_local_dtor`, and `thread_local` to `thread_local_key`. That's what this PR does.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2020
…acrum Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local I was long confused by the `thread_local` and `fast_thread_local` modules in the `sys(_common)` part of libstd. The names make it *sound* like `fast_thread_local` is just a faster version of `thread_local`, but really these are totally different APIs: one provides thread-local "keys", which are non-addressable pointer-sized pieces of local storage with an associated destructor; the other (the "fast" one) provides just a destructor. So I propose we rename `fast_thread_local` to `thread_local_dtor`, and `thread_local` to `thread_local_key`. That's what this PR does.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2020
…arth Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#73759 (Add missing Stdin and StdinLock examples) - rust-lang#74211 (Structured suggestion when not using struct pattern) - rust-lang#74228 (Provide structured suggestion on unsized fields and fn params) - rust-lang#74252 (Don't allow `DESTDIR` to influence LLVM builds) - rust-lang#74263 (Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local) - rust-lang#74271 (process_unix: prefer i32::*_be_bytes over manually shifting bytes) - rust-lang#74272 (pprust: support multiline comments within lines) - rust-lang#74332 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#74334 (bootstrap: Improve wording on docs for `verbose-tests`) - rust-lang#74336 (typeck: use `item_name` in cross-crate packed diag) - rust-lang#74340 (lint: use `transparent_newtype_field` to avoid ICE) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was long confused by the
thread_localandfast_thread_localmodules in thesys(_common)part of libstd. The names make it sound likefast_thread_localis just a faster version ofthread_local, but really these are totally different APIs: one provides thread-local "keys", which are non-addressable pointer-sized pieces of local storage with an associated destructor; the other (the "fast" one) provides just a destructor.So I propose we rename
fast_thread_localtothread_local_dtor, andthread_localtothread_local_key. That's what this PR does.