Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 6, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 6, 2020

📌 Commit 99fda5c has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 6, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2020
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67566 (Add an unstable conversion from thread ID to u64)
 - #67671 (Account for `type X = impl Trait;` in lifetime suggestion)
 - #67727 (Stabilise vec::remove_item)
 - #67877 (Omit underscore constants from rustdoc)
 - #67880 (Handle multiple error fix suggestions carefuly)
 - #67898 (Improve hygiene of `newtype_index`)
 - #67908 (rustdoc: HTML escape const values)
 - #67909 (Fix ICE in const pretty printing and resolve FIXME)
 - #67929 (Formatting an example for method Vec.retain)
 - #67934 (Clean up E0178 explanation)
 - #67936 (fire "non_camel_case_types" for associated types)
 - #67943 (Missing module std in example.)
 - #67962 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 99fda5c into rust-lang:master Jan 7, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the clean-up-e0178 branch January 7, 2020 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants