- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking #66330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    This makes it easier to add new non-standard constructors, and this also ensures that we don't forget cases when adding a new constructor.
It counts as an extra constructor for types that are not allowed to be matched exhaustively.
| (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) | 
| This looks really great! r? @varkor | 
| This looks like a simpler way to handle these cases, thanks! @bors r+ rollup | 
| 📌 Commit e398d89 has been approved by  | 
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…, r=varkor Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking The comments around code paths for the `non_exhaustive` feature mention stuff like "we act as if the type had an extra unmatcheable constructor". So I thought I'd make this explicit by defining a special constructor that does exactly this. This makes those code paths a bit more legible and less prone to error.
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #65932 (download .tar.xz if python3 is used) - #66074 ([mir-opt] Turn on the `ConstProp` pass by default) - #66094 (Fix documentation for `Iterator::count()`.) - #66166 (rename cfg(rustdoc) into cfg(doc)) - #66227 (docs: Fix link to BufWriter::flush) - #66292 (add Result::map_or) - #66297 (Add a callback that allows compiler consumers to override queries.) - #66317 (Use a relative bindir for rustdoc to find rustc) - #66330 (Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking) - #66331 (Add some tests for fixed ICEs) - #66334 (Move Session fields to CrateStore) - #66335 (Move self-profile infrastructure to data structures) - #66337 (Remove dead code for encoding/decoding lint IDs) Failed merges: r? @ghost
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…, r=varkor Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking The comments around code paths for the `non_exhaustive` feature mention stuff like "we act as if the type had an extra unmatcheable constructor". So I thought I'd make this explicit by defining a special constructor that does exactly this. This makes those code paths a bit more legible and less prone to error.
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…, r=varkor Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking The comments around code paths for the `non_exhaustive` feature mention stuff like "we act as if the type had an extra unmatcheable constructor". So I thought I'd make this explicit by defining a special constructor that does exactly this. This makes those code paths a bit more legible and less prone to error.
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Nov 13, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #65932 (download .tar.xz if python3 is used) - #66094 (Fix documentation for `Iterator::count()`.) - #66166 (rename cfg(rustdoc) into cfg(doc)) - #66186 (Add long error explanation for E0623) - #66227 (docs: Fix link to BufWriter::flush) - #66248 (add raw ptr variant of UnsafeCell::get) - #66292 (add Result::map_or) - #66297 (Add a callback that allows compiler consumers to override queries.) - #66317 (Use a relative bindir for rustdoc to find rustc) - #66330 (Improve non-exhaustiveness handling in usefulness checking) - #66331 (Add some tests for fixed ICEs) - #66334 (Move Session fields to CrateStore) - #66335 (Move self-profile infrastructure to data structures) - #66337 (Remove dead code for encoding/decoding lint IDs) Failed merges: r? @ghost
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
The comments around code paths for the
non_exhaustivefeature mention stuff like "we act as if the type had an extra unmatcheable constructor". So I thought I'd make this explicit by defining a special constructor that does exactly this.This makes those code paths a bit more legible and less prone to error.