Skip to content

Conversation

Keruspe
Copy link
Contributor

@Keruspe Keruspe commented Oct 19, 2017

In debug mode, the artifacts are placed in "debug", so don't hardcode "release" and use our helper to get the right directory name

Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <[email protected]>
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 19, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

However, I will note that distributing a debug compiler is almost certainly not what you want to do, since it will be very slow (10x or more, last I heard).

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 19, 2017

📌 Commit 27cc119 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 19, 2017
@Keruspe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Keruspe commented Oct 19, 2017

Would definitely not recommend that for production, but useful to get nice stacks in case of a segfault

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

To an extent, though usually not worth it. rustc, thankfully, rarely segfaults.

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2017
rustbuild: fix dist in debug mode

In debug mode, the artifacts are placed in "debug", so don't hardcode "release" and use our helper to get the right directory name
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45343, #45349, #45352, #45374, #45375, #45376, #45377, #45382
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 27cc119 into rust-lang:master Oct 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants