Skip to content

Conversation

birkenfeld
Copy link
Contributor

The previous version may be clearer for newcomers, but this is how you'd write it idiomaticly.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed this is more idiomatic and requires a little more background on knowledge (mainly the checked_add method) but I still think this is an improvement, thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2017

📌 Commit 496bd63 has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 496bd63 with merge 07a2dd4...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2017
Simplify FromIterator example of Result

The previous version may be clearer for newcomers, but this is how you'd write it idiomaticly.
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 11, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: frewsxcv
Pushing 07a2dd4 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 496bd63 into rust-lang:master Jun 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants