Skip to content

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@fee1-dead fee1-dead commented Jun 19, 2025

r? oli-obk

This closes #127615.

Discussion

  • Give every MutVisitor::visit_* method a corresponding flat_map_* method.

Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be mapped to multiple instances of themselves. Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be removed from existence (e.g. filter_map_expr). I don't think this is doable.

  • Give every MutVisitor::visit_* method a corresponding Visitor method and vice versa

The only three remaining method-level asymmetries after this PR are visit_stmt and visit_nested_use_tree (only on Visitor) and visit_span (only on MutVisitor).

visit_stmt doesn't seem applicable to MutVisitor because walk_flat_map_stmt_kind will ask flat_map_item / filter_map_expr to potentially turn a single Stmt to multiple based on what a visitor wants. So only using flat_map_stmt seems appropriate.

visit_nested_use_tree is used for rustc_resolve to track stuff. Not useful for MutVisitor for now.

visit_span is currently not used for MutVisitor already, it was just kept in case we want to revive #127241. cc @cjgillot maybe we could remove for now and re-insert later if we find a use-case? It does involve some extra effort to maintain.

  • Remaining FIXMEs

visit_lifetime has an extra param for Visitor that's not in MutVisitor. This is again something only used by rustc_resolve. I think we can keep that symmetry for now.

just using `walk_item` instead would be okay.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 19, 2025
@fee1-dead fee1-dead force-pushed the push-zsznlqyrzsqo branch from 68ac46d to e59533d Compare June 19, 2025 07:22
@fee1-dead fee1-dead marked this pull request as draft June 19, 2025 07:25
@fee1-dead fee1-dead marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2025 07:30
@fee1-dead fee1-dead force-pushed the push-zsznlqyrzsqo branch from e59533d to ed397ad Compare June 19, 2025 07:32
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

⌛ Trying commit ed397ad with merge a1b90e8

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
completely deduplicate `Visitor` and `MutVisitor`

r? oli-obk

This closes #127615.

### Discussion

> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `flat_map_*` method.

Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be mapped to multiple instances of themselves. Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be removed from existence (e.g. `filter_map_expr`). I don't think this is doable.

> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `Visitor` method and vice versa

The only three remaining method-level asymmetries after this PR are `visit_stmt` and `visit_nested_use_tree` (only on `Visitor`) and `visit_span` (only on `MutVisitor`).

`visit_stmt` doesn't seem applicable to `MutVisitor` because `walk_flat_map_stmt_kind` will ask `flat_map_item` / `filter_map_expr` to potentially turn a single `Stmt` to multiple based on what a visitor wants. So only using `flat_map_stmt` seems appropriate.

`visit_nested_use_tree` is used for `rustc_resolve` to track stuff. Not useful for `MutVisitor` for now.

`visit_span` is currently not used for `MutVisitor` already, it was just kept in case we want to revive #127241. cc `@cjgillot` maybe we could remove for now and re-insert later if we find a use-case? It does involve some extra effort to maintain.

* Remaining FIXMEs

`visit_lifetime` has an extra param for `Visitor` that's not in `MutVisitor`. This is again something only used by `rustc_resolve`. I think we can keep that symmetry for now.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 19, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@fee1-dead fee1-dead force-pushed the push-zsznlqyrzsqo branch from ed397ad to 3da58e6 Compare June 19, 2025 09:50
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 19, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: a1b90e8 (a1b90e8b552cbb8c94842e1b04cb49b07d4b9475, parent: 8a65ee08296b36342bf7c3cdc15312ccbc357227)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a1b90e8): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.9%, secondary -3.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.9%, 0.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.0% [-5.7%, -1.2%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [0.9%, 0.9%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 692.997s -> 691.913s (-0.16%)
Artifact size: 372.00 MiB -> 372.02 MiB (0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 20, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jun 20, 2025

Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be mapped to multiple instances of themselves. Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be removed from existence (e.g. filter_map_expr). I don't think this is doable.

yea that makes sense. The scheme you have now that generates the flat map functions and similar resolves that point sufficiently imo

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 20, 2025

📌 Commit 3da58e6 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 20, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 22, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 3da58e6 with merge c2ec753...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 22, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing c2ec753 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 22, 2025
@bors bors merged commit c2ec753 into rust-lang:master Jun 22, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing a30f178 (parent) -> c2ec753 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 4 test diffs

4 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard c2ec7532eed172e79800d28f087727c4b048badd --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-apple-2: 3390.8s -> 6193.4s (82.6%)
  2. dist-apple-various: 8421.8s -> 5763.0s (-31.6%)
  3. mingw-check-1: 1514.1s -> 1883.7s (24.4%)
  4. x86_64-apple-1: 7441.0s -> 5895.0s (-20.8%)
  5. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2604.8s -> 2905.4s (11.5%)
  6. i686-gnu-2: 5440.3s -> 6047.8s (11.2%)
  7. dist-x86_64-apple: 7918.0s -> 8744.3s (10.4%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3365.4s -> 3715.7s (10.4%)
  9. test-various: 4358.2s -> 4780.1s (9.7%)
  10. aarch64-gnu-debug: 3765.2s -> 4126.7s (9.6%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c2ec753): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -3.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.9% [-3.9%, -3.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 689.082s -> 690.174s (0.16%)
Artifact size: 371.89 MiB -> 371.90 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ast::mut_visit::MutVisitor and ast::visit::Visitor do not have corresponding methods for all their methods
6 participants