rustdoc: add two regression tests #130173
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130143 (miri-test-libstd: add missing BOOTSTRAP_ARGS) - rust-lang#130173 (rustdoc: add two regression tests) - rust-lang#130175 (`rustc_mir_transform` cleanups 3) - rust-lang#130184 (coverage: Clean up terminology in counter creation) - rust-lang#130185 (abi/compatibility test: remove tests inside repr(C) wrappers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130143 (miri-test-libstd: add missing BOOTSTRAP_ARGS) - rust-lang#130173 (rustdoc: add two regression tests) - rust-lang#130175 (`rustc_mir_transform` cleanups 3) - rust-lang#130184 (coverage: Clean up terminology in counter creation) - rust-lang#130185 (abi/compatibility test: remove tests inside repr(C) wrappers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130173 - fmease:rustdoc-regression-tests, r=notriddle rustdoc: add two regression tests They were basically copy/pasted from `tests/ui/` to `tests/rustdoc-ui/`. Not sure if it's worth adding these, I can just close these issues as is if you want. This brings the number of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-rustdoc + https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/E-needs-test from 3 down to 1. The remaining one – rust-lang#103004 — is a nasty one to retroactively find a proper(!) test for. Fixes rust-lang#98250. Fixes rust-lang#107872. r? rustdoc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
They were basically copy/pasted from
tests/ui/totests/rustdoc-ui/.Not sure if it's worth adding these, I can just close these issues as is if you want.
This brings the number of T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
+
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
from 3 down to 1.
The remaining one – #103004 — is a nasty one to retroactively find a proper(!) test for.
Fixes #98250.
Fixes #107872.
r? rustdoc