Skip to content

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

There are more directories under tests/ still to do, but this is enough for one PR.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

So we can gradually remove the ones where rustfmt can be used.
That directory doesn't contain any Rust files, so it's a trivial change.
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 30, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 30, 2024

Some changes occurred in tests/codegen/stack-probes-inline.rs

cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle

Some changes occurred in tests/codegen/sanitizer

cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle

Some changes occurred in run-make tests.

cc @jieyouxu

Some changes occurred in tests/codegen/split-lto-unit.rs

cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

This touches a lot of files and is conflict prone, so:

@bors rollup=never p=1

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

r=me once it's ready for you (and yeay, thanks a lot!).

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2024

📌 Commit d282f62 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 30, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 30, 2024

I don't want my rollup of 4 to jump ahead of this PR (that'd be kinda mean ^^).
@bors p=5

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Format some tests

There are more directories under `tests/` still to do, but this is enough for one PR.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit d282f62 with merge d7a8f2e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 31, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 31, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 31, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Format some tests

There are more directories under `tests/` still to do, but this is enough for one PR.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit fcfd885 with merge 0347206...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Format some tests

There are more directories under `tests/` still to do, but this is enough for one PR.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 31, 2024
With the exception of `tests/run-make/translation/test.rs`, which has a
syntax error.

The expected output in `rustdoc-error-lines/rmake.rs`'s required slight
tweaking.

The two `reproducible-build.rs` files need `// ignore-tidy-linelength`
because rustfmt produces lines longer than 100 chars, which tidy doesn't
like, yuk.
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hopefully I fixed that error...

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

📌 Commit 0ea498a has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 31, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

(We should update .git-blame-ignore-revs to include these commits after this PR is merged)

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@bors p=10 (making sure this PR gets merged before any rollups)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0ea498a with merge 2a2c29a...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 2a2c29a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 31, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 2a2c29a into rust-lang:master May 31, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 31, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (2a2c29a): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -3.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.6% [-4.0%, -3.2%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 667.778s -> 669.181s (0.21%)
Artifact size: 318.79 MiB -> 318.82 MiB (0.01%)

@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the format-some-tests branch May 31, 2024 20:39
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…=oli-obk

rustfmt `tests/mir-opt`

Continuing the work started in rust-lang#125759. Details in individual commit log messages.

r? `@oli-obk`
@nnethercote nnethercote mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
rustfmt more tests

This finishes the formatting of tests begun in rust-lang#125759 and continued in rust-lang#125912.

r? `@lqd`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants