Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented May 8, 2024

Follow-up to #122769. I had the time to think about this some more, in particular in the context of #119214, so I felt it was worth extending these comments some more.

I also gave up on the context of "externally reachable" as it is not called that way anywhere else in the compiler.

Cc @tmiasko @saethlin

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 8, 2024

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 8, 2024
Comment on lines 6 to 7
//! item. This obviously includes all public items. However, some of these items cannot be compiled
//! to machine code (because they are generic), and for some the machine code is not sufficient
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
//! item. This obviously includes all public items. However, some of these items cannot be compiled
//! to machine code (because they are generic), and for some the machine code is not sufficient
//! item. This obviously includes all public items. However, some of these items cannot be lowered
//! (because they are generic), and for some the machine code is not sufficient

🤷 I dislike mentioning "machine code" because a codegen backend can do things like emit JavaScript, but I don't have a particularly compelling alternative in mind.

Copy link
Member Author

@RalfJung RalfJung May 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"lowered" is extremely vague, I don't think the term is precise enough for this discussion.

And we're still mentioning machine code later in the same sentence so I don't think anything is gained by this change.

I've pushed an alternative proposal.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, I like the alternative

@saethlin
Copy link
Member

saethlin commented May 9, 2024

I like everything else in here, except the one little thing I commented on. 👍

@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

tmiasko commented May 10, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 10, 2024

📌 Commit fd2af9b has been approved by tmiasko

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 10, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124233 (Add `-lmingwex` second time in `mingw_libs`)
 - rust-lang#124318 (ignore generics args in attribute paths)
 - rust-lang#124899 (bootstrap: add comments for the automatic dry run)
 - rust-lang#124904 (reachable computation: extend explanation of what this does, and why)
 - rust-lang#124930 (Make sure we consume a generic arg when checking mistyped turbofish)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d8bf3fd into rust-lang:master May 11, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 11, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124904 - RalfJung:reachable, r=tmiasko

reachable computation: extend explanation of what this does, and why

Follow-up to rust-lang#122769. I had the time to think about this some more, in particular in the context of rust-lang#119214, so I felt it was worth extending these comments some more.

I also gave up on the context of "externally reachable" as it is not called that way anywhere else in the compiler.

Cc `@tmiasko` `@saethlin`
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the reachable branch May 11, 2024 06:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants