exhaustiveness: Prefer "0..MAX not covered" to "_ not covered"
#120727
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Nadrieril
added
A-diagnostics
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
compiler-errors
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2024
|
r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.) - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`) - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests) - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect) - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests) - rust-lang#120721 (fix `llvm_out` to use the correct LLVM root) - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh) - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const) - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Nadrieril
force-pushed
the
tweak-int-reporting
branch
from
5a3d6e4 to
9dca6be
Compare
|
Fixed conflicts |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…ompiler-errors exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered" There was an exception when reporting integer ranges as missing, it's been there for as long as I can remember. This PR removes it. I think it's nicer to report "`0..MAX` not covered" than "`_` not covered". This also makes it consistent with enums, where we report individual enum variants in this case (as showcased in the rest of the `empty-match.rs` test). r? `@estebank`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119592 (resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore) - rust-lang#120103 (Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation) - rust-lang#120206 (hir: Make sure all `HirId`s have corresponding HIR `Node`s) - rust-lang#120214 (match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first) - rust-lang#120596 ([rustdoc] Correctly generate path for non-local items in source code pages) - rust-lang#120688 (GVN: also turn moves into copies with projections) - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") - rust-lang#120734 (Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.) - rust-lang#120739 (improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119592 (resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore) - rust-lang#120103 (Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation) - rust-lang#120206 (hir: Make sure all `HirId`s have corresponding HIR `Node`s) - rust-lang#120214 (match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first) - rust-lang#120688 (GVN: also turn moves into copies with projections) - rust-lang#120702 (docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check) - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") - rust-lang#120734 (Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.) - rust-lang#120739 (improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120727 - Nadrieril:tweak-int-reporting, r=compiler-errors exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered" There was an exception when reporting integer ranges as missing, it's been there for as long as I can remember. This PR removes it. I think it's nicer to report "`0..MAX` not covered" than "`_` not covered". This also makes it consistent with enums, where we report individual enum variants in this case (as showcased in the rest of the `empty-match.rs` test). r? ``@estebank``
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119592 (resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore) - rust-lang#120103 (Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation) - rust-lang#120206 (hir: Make sure all `HirId`s have corresponding HIR `Node`s) - rust-lang#120214 (match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first) - rust-lang#120688 (GVN: also turn moves into copies with projections) - rust-lang#120702 (docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check) - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") - rust-lang#120734 (Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.) - rust-lang#120739 (improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was an exception when reporting integer ranges as missing, it's been there for as long as I can remember. This PR removes it. I think it's nicer to report "
0..MAXnot covered" than "_not covered". This also makes it consistent with enums, where we report individual enum variants in this case (as showcased in the rest of theempty-match.rstest).r? @estebank