Rollup of 3 pull requests #119166
Merged
Rollup of 3 pull requests #119166
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We have coverage tests that use async functions, but none that use async blocks.
This reduces the risk of mixing up `fn_source_span` and `body_span`, and makes it easier to pass along additional fields as needed.
The old code used a heuristic to detect async functions and adjust their coverage spans to produce better output. But there's no need to resort to a heuristic when we can just check whether the current function is actually an `async fn`.
to pick up "[M68k] Fix ODR violation in GISel code (rust-lang#72797)" rust-lang/llvm-project#159
Update documentation for `--env` compilation flag Part of rust-lang#80792. As mentioned in rust-lang#118830. It adds a mention to `tracked_env::var` and also clarifies what triggers a new compilation. r? `@Nilstrieb`
coverage: Check for `async fn` explicitly, without needing a heuristic The old code used a heuristic to detect async functions and adjust their coverage spans to produce better output. But there's no need to resort to a heuristic when we can just look back at the original definition and check whether the current function is actually an `async fn`. In addition to being generally nicer, this also gets rid of the one piece of code that specifically cares about `CoverageSpan::is_closure` representing an actual closure. All remaining code that inspects that field just uses it as an indication that the span is a hole that should be carved out of other spans, and then discarded. That opens up the possibility of introducing other kinds of “hole” spans, e.g. for nested functions/types/macros, and having them all behave uniformly. --- `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
Update LLVM submodule to pick up "[M68k] Fix ODR violation in GISel code (rust-lang#72797)" rust-lang/llvm-project#159. Fixes rust-lang#107668
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ p=3 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 8fca8295cb In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (92ad4b4): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 674.047s -> 672.918s (-0.17%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
--envcompilation flag #119115 (Update documentation for--envcompilation flag)async fnexplicitly, without needing a heuristic #119155 (coverage: Check forasync fnexplicitly, without needing a heuristic)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup