Skip to content

Conversation

BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU commented Jul 5, 2023

Part of rust-lang/compiler-team#616

turns out there's a lot of places we construct Ty this is a ridiculously huge PR :S

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jul 5, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 5, 2023

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo

Some changes might have occurred in exhaustiveness checking

cc @Nadrieril

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU force-pushed the move_ty_ctors_to_ty branch from 18728d0 to 12138b8 Compare July 5, 2023 19:27
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ pub trait EvalContextExt<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir>: crate::MiriInterpCxExt<'mir, 'tcx> {
let size = u64::try_from(os_str.len()).unwrap().checked_add(1).unwrap(); // Make space for `0` terminator.
let this = self.eval_context_mut();

let arg_type = this.tcx.mk_array(this.tcx.types.u8, size);
let arg_type = Ty::new_array(this.tcx.tcx,this.tcx.types.u8, size);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

subtree formatting :(

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ p=10 (very bitrotty!!)

cc subtree owners (@rust-lang/miri, @rust-lang/clippy, and @antoyo for codegen_gcc), you all will need to run rustfmt on your own after this lands.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 5, 2023

📌 Commit 6ce1c89 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 5, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

(oh and @bjorn3 too, you're a subtree owner too!)

@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU assigned compiler-errors and unassigned oli-obk Jul 5, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Noting as a retrospective, but not a blocker of this PR, that we have a lot of code even within the compiler/ directory which is unformatted and remains a bit ugly due to this PR (e.g. Ty::mk_unit(tcx,)).

This is not this PR's fault, but the fault of not having formatting for let-chains in-tree. I've chatted separately with @calebcartwright to understand how we can get provisional formatting into rust sooner than later now that we (T-style) have decided on a new nightly-features formatting policy 😉

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Additional nice-to-haves after this PR lands (just the ones that come to mind):

  • Replace usages of Ty::new_unit with tcx.types.unit (or vice versa) and similar with the other built-in scalar types for Consistency(TM).
  • Replace usages of ty::new_ref that have a fixed mutability with new_imm_ref or new_mut_ref to shorten it and avoid having to go through ty::TyAndMutability -- new_ref should imo only be used when the mutability is being passed in or is variable or something.
  • Ideally we'd fix some of the annoying formatting blips (like a lack of spacing after tcx, in the args) before getting full let-chains support...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6ce1c89 with merge b3485f33f946f7556722b47529e79f82632fb229...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 6, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 6, 2023

@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2023

📌 Commit deda49e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 6, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2023

⌛ Testing commit deda49e with merge 4dd1719...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 4dd1719 to master...

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4dd1719): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.7% [-1.1%, -0.4%] 10
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.7% [-1.1%, -0.4%] 10

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.1% [-4.3%, -1.4%] 8
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.5% [-1.5%, -1.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.1% [-4.3%, -1.4%] 8

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 659.042s -> 656.237s (-0.43%)

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2023
…ler-errors

Move `TyCtxt::mk_x` to `Ty::new_x` where applicable

Part of rust-lang/compiler-team#616

turns out there's a lot of places we construct `Ty` this is a ridiculously huge PR :S

r? `@oli-obk`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants